Answer:
The ideas behind the Boston Tea Party can still be seen in politics today. The Sons of Liberty were angry about unfair government, so they protested through the destruction of government property. If, in modern day, the government was as unfair as it was during colonial times then these forms of protest would surely be popular. However, it is extremely unlikely that everyone would support it. Even back at the real Boston Tea Party a group called the loyalist did not support the Sons of Liberty. Similar groups would most likely form that would also disagree with a modern-day Boston Tea Party.
1 Puerto Rico
2 Christopher Columbus
Answer:
The bill outlined specific constitutional and civil rights and ultimately gave Parliament power over the monarchy.
Answer:
C. a wealthy backcountry settler in Virginia
Explanation:
In 1673, he arrived from England to Virginia, where he acquired two plantations in the western territories bordering with the Indians. Protecting the interests of planters and farmers whose lands were in the west of the colony, he demanded decisive action by the colony administration to oust and exterminate the Indians, criticizing the governor and his entourage for their passivity and unwillingness to lose income from profitable trade with the Indian tribes. For disobedience to the governor, Nathaniel Bacon was declared a rebel. In the summer of 1676 he captured the capital of the colony - Jamestown - and forced the legislative assembly of the colony to adopt a series of decrees known as the Bacon's Laws.
Answer:
There are several reasons why we might oppose to the annexation of Hawaii by the United States government. Some of this could be:
The fact that all people and nations have the right to govern themselves. Hawaiians deserve to make their own decisions.
The deposition of Queen Liliuokalani was forceful, and did not follow democratic or legal procedures.
A treaty of friendship, as existed originally, already gives the United States many privileges in terms of trade.
The economy of Hawaii was already very integrated to that of the United States.
A new state in the country represents a significant expense for the federal government.
