1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Stella [2.4K]
3 years ago
14

Let x be 3 and y be 4 and z is 5 x + y / xz

Mathematics
2 answers:
bezimeni [28]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

[See Below]

Step-by-step explanation:

Hey~There!

_____________________

➜ First we have to turn to into a proper equation:

  • 3+4 ÷ 3*5

➜ Now we solve the two parts:

  • 3+4=7
  • 3*5=15

➜ Then we can divide:

  • 7 ÷ 15=0.466666667...

_____________________

So your answer would be:

  • <u>Full equation</u>: 3+4 ÷ 3*5
  • <u>Simplified Equation</u>: 7 ÷ 15
  • <u>Simplified Answer</u>: 0.47

_____________________

Hope~this~helps~Mate!\\-Your~Friendly~Answerer,~Shane ヅ

eimsori [14]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

7/15

Step-by-step explanation:

3 + 4 / 3 * 5

7 / 15

You might be interested in
What is the slope-intercept equation of the line below?
lisov135 [29]
Rise over run
10/2 = 5
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which of the following point-slope form equations could be produced with the points (-5, -2) and (1, 2)?
Harman [31]

The point-slope form:

y-y_1=m(x-x_1)\\\\m=\dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}

We have the points (-5, -2) and (1, 2). Substitute:

m=\dfrac{2-(-2)}{1-(-5)}=\dfrac{2+2}{1+5}=\dfrac{4}{6}=\dfrac{2}{3}\\\\y-(-2)=\dfrac{2}{3}(x-(-5))\\\\\y+2=\dfrac{2}{3}(x+5)\to c.

7 0
3 years ago
Evaluate -6-(-6) +7+(-4) + (-1).​
frutty [35]

<em>solution</em><em> </em><em>:</em><em>-</em><em>-</em>

  • = -6 + 6 + 7 - 4 - 1

  • = 6 + 7 - 6 - 4 - 1

  • = 13 - 11

  • = 2
3 0
3 years ago
What is 324,650 rounded to the nearest one's place
Alex_Xolod [135]
Did you mean thousands? If you did the answer is <span>325,000

Happy studying ^_^

</span>
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
In the figure, ∠1 ≅ ∠2, ∠3 ≅ ∠4, and . You can justify the conclusion that ∠TKL ≅ ∠TLK by stating _____
VladimirAG [237]
From the question, we know that we will be looking at <3, <4, and angles TKL and TLK. That being said, since <3 is congruent to <4, that means that angles TKL and TLK, which are each supplementary to either angle 3 or 4, are congruent because, since angles 3 and 4 are congruent, they are congruent because the supplements of congruent angles are congruent. 
3 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • 1 3/5 = 1 + 3/5 the whole number part is
    9·1 answer
  • HELP PLEASE THANKS!!!!!
    7·2 answers
  • Complete the square to rewrite y = x^2 – 6x + 14 in vertex form. Then state whether the vertex is a maximum or minimum and give
    11·2 answers
  • What is the next 2 numbers in the pattern 0.006, 0.06, 0.6, 6 ?
    11·2 answers
  • Is 468 divisible by 3?
    11·2 answers
  • What the answer to this problem I need the answer as soon as possible
    9·1 answer
  • 12 out of 52 cards in a deck are face cards. What percentage of cards in a deck are face cards, to the nearest whole percent?
    13·1 answer
  • Terrance wants to determine the height, x, of a nearby tree. He stands 29 feet from the base of the tree. The measure of the ang
    13·1 answer
  • Which is equal to 9 x 8?
    12·2 answers
  • 8x + 1 = -8 - X<br> What is X?
    10·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!