PLZ HELP !
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Given that:
A marketing organization claims that more than 10% of its employees are paid minimum wage.
The null hypothesis is:
The alternative hypothesis is:
If a hypothesis test is performed that fails to reject the null hypothesis, how would this decision be interpreted
i.e Decision Rule: fails to reject the null hypothesis
Then the interpretation of the decision is that, there is insufficient evidence to support the claim that more than 10% of the employees are paid minimum wage.
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3> The complete exercise is: "Omar works as a tutor for $15 an hour and as a waiter for $7 an hour. This month, he worked a combined total of 83 hours at his two jobs. Let "t" be the number of hours Omar worked as a tutor this month. Write an expression for the combined total dollar amount he earned this month."</h3><h3 />Let be "t" the number of hours Omar worked as a tutor this month and "w" the number of hours Omar worked as a waiter this month.
Based on the data given in the exercise, you know that Omar worked a combined total of 83 hours this month.
Then, you can represent the number of hours he worked as a waiter this month with this equation:
Since he earns $15 per hour working has a tutor and $7 per hour working as a waiter, you can write the following expresion to represent the total money earned:
Since , you can substitute it into the expression and then simplify it in order to find the final expression that represents the total amount of money Omar earned this month.
This is: