By stronger I'm not meaning have our government be over us in all ways but making our government a stronger forced to be reckoned with. This could be a great way to make our country an "ideal country".
Answer:
A forest fire will release carbon trapped in the lithosphere into the atmosphere. Also it's a lot of oxygen doming out of all the trees.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is attracting new customers to existing markets.
Explanation:
In making her decision, Kristen must have noticed that female teens are very frequent to the hockey arena where her retail store is located, making them her target consumers. Besides, she must have realized that usually, they wear colorful clothing. Those two factors possibly pushed her to request colorful female teenager clothing for her store. By this, Kristen is calling the attention of new consumers in a market that already existed.
A major difference between systematic observation and naturalistic observation is that systematic observation is option D. observes specific behaviors in specific settings unlike naturalistic observation.
<h3>What is a naturalistic observation?</h3>
Naturalistic observation is a research methodology in numerous fields of science including ethology, anthropology, linguistics, the social sciences, and psychology, in which data are collected as they occur in nature, without any manipulation by the observer.
Therefore, the correct answer is as given above.
learn more about Naturalistic observation: brainly.com/question/8187021
#SPJ1
Answer:
Inductive reasoning
Explanation:
Inductive reasoning results as an initial inquiry is present on the research, thereby a method of reasoning with premises that partially show some evidence for an eventual conclusion.
Often inductive reasoning is contrasted to deductive reasoning:
The deductive reasoning departs from an argument considered certain, while on inductive reasoning the argument may turn likely for the evidence that has been observed so far.
In social science, one way of engaging in inductive reasoning is by making ourselves questions about something we have only in part observed, then we construct a series of questions that will construct our hypothesis, and this hypothesis will either turn to be true or false, if it turns false an alternative hypothesis should be included.
<em>Sometimes inductive reasoning is called </em><u><em>"Bottom-up reasoning " for it goes from the particular observations to general conclusions.</em></u>
<em>We obtain general principles for phenomena through observation, however, inductive reasoning is always based on specific instances and thus narrowed, sometimes leading to review or reconsider weak arguments.</em>
