Answer:
Which of the following statements is CORRECT?
a. Operating income is derived from the firm's regular core business. Operating income is calculated as Revenues less Operating costs. Operating costs do not include interest or taxes.
Explanation:
Operating income is an accounting figure that measures the amount of profit realized from a business's operations, after deducting operating expenses such as wages, depreciation, and cost of goods sold (COGS).
Answer:
her expected gain is $45,000.
Explanation:
If she wins
She will make = $400,000
Probability of winning = 0.3
Expected income = $400,000 x 0.3 = $120,000
Cost on the cash = $75,000
Expected gain = Expected income - Cost = $120,000 - $75,000 = $45,000
If she loses the case she has to bear the cost incurred to prepare the case. So, the probability on the cost side is 1 but probability on the income side is 0.3 so we calculated the 0.3 probable income which is $120,000 after deducting the cost the lawyer will have expected gain of $45,000 only.
False, credit score does affect insurance but just because someone has bad credit doesn’t mean they get lower insurance rates
The concentration ratio for Industry M is 52%.
The concentration ratio of industry M can be determined by adding the the ratio of the output to the total output of each of the six firms together.
- Ratio of firm 1's output to total output = 22,987 / 198,400 = 0.11586 = 11.59%
- Ratio of firm 2's output to total output = 21,444 / 198,400 = 0.1081 = 10.81%
- Ratio of firm 3's output to total output = 18,787 / 198,400 = 0.0947 = 9.47%
- Ratio of firm 4's output to total output = 16,454 / 198,400 = 0.0829 = 8.29%
- Ratio of firm 5's output to total output = 12,890 / 198,400 = 0.065 = 6.5%
- Ratio of firm 6's output to total output = 22,987 / 198,400 = 0.0506 = 5.06%
Sum of the percentages = 51.72%
Please find attached a table used to answer the question. A similar question was answered here: brainly.com/question/14903886
Answer:
Many managers today are trained under assumptions of adversarial relationships with other companies. It is very much difficult operating as adversaries as compared to be partners with other companies. It has been seen that when two or more than two companies partnered with one another, then they can perform much better as compared to the situation when they compete head to head. Joining hands with other companies can give you certain sustainable competitive advantage which can never be easily imitated and copied by your competitors. When you pool your resources and share technology and risks and sell your products/services together which is quite helpful for the both companies. For example, when Dell and intel processors share their resources and sell them together, both can have tremendous sales and market share. It can be very helpful and effective for both of the organization. One company can leverage its products and sales with the help of another company. In this strategy of becoming partner, strategic alliance between both organization can get stronger hold in the market with more and enhanced brand awareness, sales and profits as well, therefore, managers can work best when they for making partners instead of rivalry.
