1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
hammer [34]
3 years ago
10

Many managers today were trained under assumptions of adversarial relationships with other companies. Do you think operating as

adversaries is easier or more difficult than operating as partners with other companies? Discuss
Business
1 answer:
dusya [7]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

Many managers today are trained under assumptions of adversarial relationships with other companies. It is very much difficult operating as adversaries as compared to be partners with other companies. It has been seen that when two or more than two companies partnered with one another, then they can perform much better as compared to the situation when they compete head to head. Joining hands with other companies can give you certain sustainable competitive advantage which can never be easily imitated and copied by your competitors. When you pool your resources and share  technology and risks and sell your products/services together which is quite helpful for the both companies. For example, when Dell and intel processors share their resources and sell them together, both can have tremendous sales and market share. It can be very helpful and effective for both of the organization. One company can leverage its products and sales with the help of another company. In this strategy of becoming partner, strategic alliance between both organization can get stronger hold in the market with more and enhanced brand awareness, sales and profits as well, therefore, managers can work best when they for making partners instead of rivalry.

You might be interested in
1.
Ksenya-84 [330]

Answer:

i dont know

Explanation:

and i dont care

8 0
3 years ago
What is the difference between an "increase in demand" and an "increase in quantity demanded"?
alekssr [168]

A shift to the right of the demand curve signifies a "increase in demand," whereas movement along a particular demand curve signifies a "increase in quantity demanded." The correct response is option (B).

<h3>What is increase in demand?</h3>

A rise in demand will cause a rise in the equilibrium price and an increase in supply, all other things being equal. Reduced demand will result in a decrease in the equilibrium price and an increase in supply.

An rise in the quantity needed results from a decrease in the cost of the good (and vice versa). A demand curve depicts the amount desired and any market price. A change in quantity demanded is represented as a shift along a demand curve.

To know more about increase in demand, visit:

brainly.com/question/13213873

#SPJ1

6 0
1 year ago
Gentle Ben's Bar and Restaurant uses 7,400 quart bottles of an imported wine each year. The effervescent wine costs $5 per bottl
Leto [7]

Hey! How are you? My name is Maria, 19 years old. Yesterday broke up with a guy, looking for casual sex.

Write me here and I will give you my phone number - *pofsex.com*

My nickname - Lovely

7 0
3 years ago
How to do spousal pay included?
Elena L [17]

The attached picture entails the Income tax that is filed for 4 different tax payer.

<h3>What is a spousal pay?</h3>

In U.S., this refers to periodic and predetermined sum awarded to a spouse or former spouse following a separation or divorce.

Actually, the spousal pay is not involved in the calculation of the Income Tax which is filled in the attached picture.

Read more about spousal pay

<em>brainly.com/question/24535935</em>

#SPJ1

4 0
1 year ago
The insured under a $100,000 life insurance policy with a triple indemnity rider for accidental death was killed in a car accide
gregori [183]

Answer:

$100,000

Explanation:

A triple indemnity clause attached to a life insurance policy should pay in case of accidental death three times the amount of the policy. But in order for this clause to be effective, the insured must not have any responsibility in the accident.

In this case, since the accident was caused by the insured, the triple indemnity clause doesn't apply, so the regular amount ($100,000) has to be paid to the beneficiary.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Gwendolyn and jack francis are investors with no financial training or investment background. which approach will they likely ta
    13·1 answer
  • Real GDP per capital is found by A.dividing population by real GDP. B.dividing real GDP by population C. Subtracting population
    9·1 answer
  • McCann Publishing has a target capital structure of 35% debt and 65% equity. This year's capital budget is $850,000 and it wants
    5·1 answer
  • 2. Explain two ways that an informational interview is different from a job interview 3. Describe two ways that an informational
    10·1 answer
  • Assume that we are back to talking about bags of oranges (a private good), but that the government has decided that tossed orang
    14·1 answer
  • A professional basketball players' union negotiates a contract that dramatically increases all players' salaries. How would this
    7·1 answer
  • This year Randy paid $28,000 of interest. (Randy borrowed $450,000 to buy his residence, which is currently worth $500,000.) Ran
    8·1 answer
  • Paragon Leasing has been approached by Mid-America Trucking Company (MATC) to provide lease financing for a fleet of new tractor
    10·1 answer
  • Which options are SmartArt categories? Check all that apply.
    8·1 answer
  • You own a bond that pays $64 in interest annually. The face value is $1,000 and the current market price is $1,062.50. The bond
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!