Answer:
The correct answer is A.
Explanation:
Giving the following information:
On October 1, 2014, Mann Company places a new asset into service. The cost of the asset is $80,000 with an estimated 5-year life and $20,000 salvage value at the end of its useful life.
Annual depreciation= (original cost - salvage value)/estimated life (years)
Annual depreciation= 60,000/5=12,000
3 months depreciation= 12,000/12*3= 3,000
Answer:
Y=38.8
Y will increase by 38.8
Y=246+38.8
Y=284.8
Explanation:
Y=A. F(K, L)
Y=A. K^0.3, L^0.7
Then
Y=246
A=1
K=2000
N or L=100
Solutions
200=1(2000^0.3, 100^0.7)
Now the question says both k & N are increased by 0.20
Therefore
Y=1(2400^0.3, 120^0.7)
Y=1(10.3 + 28.5)
Y=38.8
Answer:
Left by $400; Left by $300
Explanation:
Given that,
Marginal propensity to consume, MPC = 0.75
Government spending multiplier = 4
(a) If the government decreases its purchases by $100 million, then the magnitude of the shift in aggregate demand curve is calculated by multiplying the change in government spending to the government spending multiplier.
Aggregate demand curve shift left by
= Change in government spending × Government spending multiplier
= $100 × 4
= $400 million
(b) If the government increases income taxes by $100 million, then the magnitude of the shift in aggregate demand curve is calculated by multiplying the change in taxes to the tax multiplier.
Tax multiplier:
= MPC ÷ (1 - MPC)
= 0.75 ÷ (1 - 0.75)
= 0.75 ÷ 0.25
= 3
Aggregate demand curve shift left by
= Change in taxes × Tax multiplier
= $100 × 3
= $300 million
False, while the supply of major film stars is small and relatively fixed in the short run, the demand for the average doctor or nurse is quite large globally. By stating that the marginal benefit of services provided by doctors and nurses is considerably lower than the marginal benefit of services provided by major film stars, the diamond-water paradox is illustrated. This suggests that while there is a greater demand than there is for major film stars, there is a greater supply of doctors and nurses.
The marginal utility that major movie stars provide to moviegoers is greater than the marginal utility that patients receive from doctors and nurses. This is due to the fact that people who use the services of well-known actors and actresses are more willing to pay for them than people who use the services of physicians and nurses. Though a person's health is more important to their quality of life than movies, consumers value movies more for their utility than their health, especially once they have achieved a basic level of sound health. This actually explains the "diamond water paradox," in which consumers are willing to pay more for valuable diamonds than they are for the water that sustains life. In plain English, people are more willing to value the satisfaction they get from watching one more movie than they are from receiving more medical attention. That implies that people only give basic healthcare needs a thought.
Note that the full question is:
Movie stars such as Salma Hayek, Samuel L. Jackson, Dwayne Johnson, and Jennifer Lawrence are paid millions of dollars per movie, which can take as much as 6 months of full-time work for an actor. By contrast, doctors and nurses earn considerably less over the same time period. Why might this be? While the supply of (major film stars OR doctors and nurses) is small and relatively fixed in the short run, the demand for (the average doctor or nurse OR movies featuring these film stars) is quite large globally. By contrast, the marginal benefit of the services provided by (major film stars OR doctors and nurses) is relatively low, although the total benefit is quite high. This illustrates the diamond-water paradox. True or False
Learn more about marginal utility brainly.com/question/15050855
#SPJ4
Criteria in contracting a vendor are:
<span> Years in business Ability to constantly supply products. Ability to supply complete requirements. Flexibility to allow changes in orders or product lines. Substantial catalogue of products. Has staff that can answer questions you may have. Testimonials and references. Sustainability and financial stability. Prices. Delivery times. Terms of business. Customer service. </span>
<span>The most important factor to consider in contracting a vendor for multiple locations would be delivery times. </span><span>You need assurance that deliveries can be made where and when you want them.</span>
