A. The government that emerged through the Articles was one where state power was maximized. The autonomy of the states and the ability to not have any oversight or check from the federal government helped to create a "loose confederation of states" where a lack of central authority was present.
Whenever a consumer goes shopping, they are paying higher prices because the producers are marking the price up because of tariffs. So, the consumers are paying tariffs ultimately.
Countries import and export supplies for resources, some countries do not have enough of a specific resource to satisfy the country. Therefore, they export some of their supplies for some imports from other countries. Also, they may trade for wealth, for example they might export oil for money.
I hope this helps! This is typed in my own word, you dont have to worry about re-wording it.
Answer:
my brother has autism i don't help him alot he's pretty smart
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
As it happens in most cases, this issue has advantages and disadvantages. But the thing is that under the present economic, political, and social conditions, smaller families have better chances to offer the support to raise children and give them education, shelter, proper nutrition, and better chances to thrive.
In the past, natality control was not an issue. Parents could have two, three, and more children. The economic conditions were completely different from the ones we are living in today.
Education has played a major role in creating consciousness in new generations about having a small family or not at all. Young couples have different priorities such as personal development, scale-up in the corporate world, travel, and other different options.
