Answer:
That statement is true.
Explanation:
"Key areas" of the business refers to business activities that directly related in core business operation. These activities are the one with most influence in determining how much products the companies able to sell to the consumers.
Internal weakness in SWOT analysis refers to consist of the things from within the company that can create some sort of damage to the company's operation if not taken care of.
Leaving internal weakness unfixed with heavily damage the productivity of company. Not only that, it could also damage the market's perception toward the company. When the customers have completely lost faith in the quality of company's product, there is almost nothing the company can do to fix it.
Answer:
What do you mean what yousnap
Explanation:
Answer:
The manager does not understand the contingency view.
Explanation:
The manager who focuses only on one part of the business then will not understand the contingency view. Here, the contingency view refers to the behavior of the manager to lead every situation or problem in the company. Therefore, to make a decision it is required to focus on all parts of the organization. Since in the question it is given that the manager focus only on one part of the company that means he will be unable to understand every situation of the company.
Based on the percentage of readers who own a particular make of the car and the random sample, we can infer that there is sufficient evidence at a 0.02 level to support the executive claim.
<h3>What is the evidence to support the executive's claim?</h3>
The hypothesis is:
Null hypothesis : P = 0.55
Alternate hypothesis : P ≠ 0.55
We then need to find the test statistic:
= (Probability found by marketing executive - Probability from publisher) / √( (Probability from publisher x (1 - Probability from publisher))/ number of people sampled
= (0.46 - 0.55) / √(( 0.55 x ( 1 - 0.55)) / 200
= -2.56
Using this z value as the test statistic, perform a two-tailed test to show:
= P( Z < -2.56) + P(Z > 2.56)
= 0.0052 + 0.0052
= 0.0104
The p-value is 0.0104 which is less than the significance level of 0.02. This means that we reject the null hypothesis.
The Marketing executive was correct.
Find out more on the null and alternate hypothesis at brainly.com/question/25263462
#SPJ1
Answer:
Entry: 1. Dr bad debts expense 5500
Cr Allowance for uncollectible accounts 5500
Explanation:
1.Account receivable = $44000
Allowance for uncollectible accounts(Dec,31 2021) = $1100
44000* 15% = 6600 - 1100 = $5500 Allowance for uncollectible accounts
2. Bad debts expense = (44000* 15%) = 6600
3. Uncollecible accounts = (Open) Allowance for bad debts + Current year Allowance.
= 1100 + 6600 = $7700.
4. 44000 - 7700 = $36300 net account receiable