Answer:
B) whistle-blowing.
Explanation:
An individual who discloses information or conduct in secret that is considered illegal, immoral, or not appropriate within a private or a public organisation is a Whistleblower.Whistleblowing tells the authorities or the populace that your organization does something illegal or immoral or its gives out the wrongdoing of another colleague to the authorities of the organisation.
Answer:
We can take for example Josip Broz Tito, a former president of Yugoslavia.
Explanation:
During his time the country went to the period of renewal. People, especially women gained more rights, new laws were introduced. The rate of literacy increased as never before. Reforms were introduced, country prospered. I believe that we can compare him with Charlemagne as although as him he wasn't very educated he realized the need for education, literacy and improvement of life condition as well.
Answer:
The correct answer would be, It lessens the chance that bias will affect the review process.
Explanation:
Grant proposal reviewers are people who review the proposal came to them to approve or reject a grant. They select the proposal on the basis of certain ground to approve the grant. If there comes a proposal, which conflicts with their interest, then it is better to get themselves removed from the review process, because if they do so, there are pretty fair chances that they become biased and can reject the grant on the basis of their own views. So if they get themselves separated from the review process, it would lessen the chance that bias will affect the review process.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": Integrated social contracts theory.
Explanation:
Integrated social contracts theory is a concept in ethics business attributed to Thomas Donaldson (born 1945) and Thomas Dunfee (1941-2008). The objective of this theory is to create a structure for managerial and business decisions concerning their effect on <em>local societies</em>, <em>ethical principles</em>, and <em>universal moral standards</em>.
Answer:
Talmadge argued FDR's New Deal programs were infringing on the rights of the states
Explanation:<em> A staunch Georgian Democrat, he believed in white superiority and the rules of the Jim Crow south. Programs like the WPA and the CCC allowed for black workers and in the South this was unacceptable and refuted their current social structure. Talmadge believed that the states should have the right to choose the workers for the programs implemented in their states. </em>
<em />