Both claims are false. In fact,
and
are one the multiplicative inverse of the other. This means, by definition of multiplicative inverse, that

So, it doesn't matter if
is positive or negative: the multiplication of one number and its inverse will always be 1: for example,

Similarly, when you multiply two number, the sign of the product depends on the sign of the factors as follows:
So, the multiplication of two negative numbers is a positive number.
The answer would be y=(x+4)^2-37
<h2>1.</h2>
Firstly, combine like terms: 
Next, subtract r on both sides of the equation: 
Next, add 8 onto both sides of the equation: 
Lastly, divide both sides by 6 and <em><u>your answer will be r = 3.</u></em>
<h2>2.</h2>
Firstly, multiply both sides by e: 
Lastly, divide both sides by 3, and <em><u>your answer will be
</u></em>
If f(x) is given with points (0,5) and (4,3), it can be easily plotted in a coordinate system (see .jpeg image in attachment).If g(x) is a function defined by text:
Kyle started the summer having read 3 books but plans to read 6 books per month over the summer.Then, g(x) is given with:
g(x) = 6*x+3 (3 books read already, and 6 books will be read each month).h(x) is already given with:
h(x)=3*x+4
These all three functions are plotted in coordinate system and it can be seen that the lowest y-intercept has function g(x), and it is the value of 3 on y-axis. Others have 4 (h(x)) and 5 (f(x)).