1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
DanielleElmas [232]
3 years ago
6

I was looking at you and you were looking at me and i was thinkin ooooooooo go damarcus go damarcus EXTRA POINTS FOR ANSWERING H

OW WAS YOUR DAY!!!!!​
Law
2 answers:
Monica [59]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

my day has actually been okay so far, thank you, just finishing an assignment and eating breakfast. hope you're having an even better one. thanks for the points.

CaHeK987 [17]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

its been boring, but its raining so its making it a bit more exciting.

Explanation:

thanks for asking :)

You might be interested in
If you needed to raise money on your visits, which three districts would you visit? What information influenced your decision? W
GrogVix [38]

2, 3, 4

the crime rates

unemployment

4 0
2 years ago
Must all elements of probable cause exist before a lawful arrest can be made?
kkurt [141]

householdThereWhichever,

Probable cause is a requirement found in the Fourth Amendment that must usually be met before the police make an arrest, conduct a search, or receive a warrant.

“Probable cause” is a legal standard applied to the police and prosecutors; individual citizens don’t “get” probable cause.

Police must demonstrate sufficient probable cause to believe that there is evidence of a crime to obtain a search warrant or an arrest warrant.

Prosecutors must demonstrate sufficient probable cause as to every element of a charged crime to proceed with filing charges and beginning the trial process.

There is no clear legal definition of what constitutes “probable cause” — it’s somewhere between suspicion and proof. The closest you’ll come is the 1949 case Brinegar v. the United States in which the Supreme Court described it thus:

“…where the facts and circumstances within the officers' knowledge, and of which they have reasonably trustworthy information, are sufficient in themselves to warrant a belief by a man of reasonable caution that a crime is being committed.”

Please imagine a situation when someone very healthy falls ill all of a sudden and the reason is not immediately known. You take that person to a doctor and the doctor will ask you to identify the root cause of the illness, generally as under:

type of food the person ate recently

what liquids he/she consumed

whether he/she traveled recently and had food from outside,

whether affected by climate change,

whether any drastic change in his/her daily routine etc.

any other likely change in his/her work schedule

The above list could be the probable causes from which the doctor can identify the root cause for the illness.

II. Similarly, when an inexplicable accident happens(the driver cannot find out the cause), several questions like the following may be asked:

was there break failure

did one of the tires burst

was the driver distracted by someone(suddenly crossing the road etc.)

did the driver doze off(sleep for a while)

The above can be considered as the probable causes, to arrive at the root cause of the accident.

This is cause and this is the effect is a highly scientific approach and it is hardly possible in less than 1% of our day-to-day life despite our 99% dependence on only science-originated things. It is a decision without measurements, proper logic errors, etc., we are forced to land in probability and possibility. Maximum experience is in medical decisions, especially in new upcoming nuisance topics like a corona. Only probable cause is guessed. There is nothing when a patient comes with corona. Whichever is the cause treat him with your best tools as a doctor? Those who work in huge projects of prevention, curtailing, “stop-the-spread” projects will break their heads.

A simple example from a household happening. The jewel kept on a chair just temporarily is missing. 1. Somebody should have kept it safely 2. Somebody should have pocketed it on a non-returnable basis 3. The servants should have taken full benefit of our negligence and we should start searching for what more is stolen 4. The jeweler whom we told that we have some repair work should have come and taken it for repair, we telephone and find out. 5. Government announced gold control when Morarji was P.M. Some excise officer should have read it now, noticed our careless and taken it.

Which out of these is most probable?

Nothing! The jewel was under the cushion of the chair.

Two servants were dismissed forever. There is no excise department connection with that jewel. Nobody can keep it more safely than what the jewel can keep its good self. That jeweler has left the city two years ago.

All guesswork done is included in only probable causes, many cause foolish. Some are probable. But the actual happening has not chosen that. It is the house that has chosen those causes. The scientific or guess ability of the house is clear to them at least.

Probable cause is a guesswork cause that may be or may not be tallying with the truth. The correct guess is 100% probable!

The jewel missing cause is 0% probable!

6 0
3 years ago
4. Imagine you are an investigator who has brought in a potential suspect in a murder investigation. the suspect is 30 years old
ELEN [110]

Answer:

I would ask what has happen between the two in the last month. What harsh stuff the murdered person has done. Ask the personality of the victim. And see if there is negative responses in his answers.

Explanation:

8 0
2 years ago
Aside from a target, who else can be impacted by online cruelty? Who else could be involved, implicitly or explicitly?
Verdich [7]

Answer:

Online Cruelty takes places when a person uses digital tools such as mobile phones and internet to harass or upset someone, often repeatedly.

Such people behave thoughtlessly and cruelly.

It harms a person's mental well being and health.

It can encourage other people to carry out physical attack as cruelty threatens a persons physical integrity.

<u><em>The family members and friends of the target are likely to be affected by the behavioral changes in the target.</em></u>

4 0
3 years ago
Alcatuieste enunturi in care sa se afle :1) un atribut adjectival exprimat prin adjectiv provenit din verb la participiu ,2)un a
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

  • <u>Translated from Romanian language:</u>

"Make statements in which: 1) an adjectival attribute expressed by an adjective from the verb to the participle, 2) a substantive attribute expressed by its own noun, 3) a pronominal attribute expressed by reflexive pronouns, 4) a pronominal attribute expressed by a pronoun personally, 5) an adverbial attribute expressed by the adverb of mod."

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following has the power to declare war, establish a post office, maintain an army, make money, and regulate commerc
    8·1 answer
  • Which illustrates the proper outline for a judge's opinion on a case?
    11·1 answer
  • If party is unhappy with the decision handed by the U.S. Court of Appeals, what is their next step?
    12·1 answer
  • Can someone give me topics that I can use to a create a bill for a class project
    10·2 answers
  • What type of fingerprint is this?
    14·1 answer
  • In no fewer than 100-words, explain why a retired civilian police officer would make an excellent civilian military police offic
    8·1 answer
  • tony lives on one side of the city and works on the other. he will save ten minutes if he drives through the park
    5·1 answer
  • Guys what’s jay walking is it like the moonwalk
    10·1 answer
  • No state in the US allows the Governor to directly select people to serve as judges. Group of answer choices true false
    15·1 answer
  • What are some of the penalties for violating fraud, waste, and abuse (FWA) laws?
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!