1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kipish [7]
3 years ago
6

“Police and crime commissioners have no real power, their presence is to just keep the public happy” arguments for and against

Law
1 answer:
Jobisdone [24]3 years ago
3 0
For: some people tend to feel safer when higher officials who “solve” crime are present, making people happier they are safe. they can be doing nothing and people would feel at ease knowing if something happens, the police are there to solve the problem

against: police and crime commissioners have too much power, in fact they control the people and abuse it. minorities and poc tend to feel unsafe when police are around bc they use more of their power to control them with fear
You might be interested in
How do you identify employees who have violent potential and how do you deal with them?
spin [16.1K]

Explanation:

<u><em>i will focus to them of what he do or they do that not know them that i keep watching they do everything.It because i didn't like that kind of ability liying to everyone can't work fairlly it's so unfair.</em></u>

6 0
3 years ago
A county governed by a central party is best characterized as
liubo4ka [24]
A:communist hope this helps :)
6 0
3 years ago
Describe a situation where two different people might perceive a crime scene in different ways.
puteri [66]

Answer:

a mur*** that can be seen as a suici** some people may think it was a mur*** some think it looks like a suici**.

7 0
1 year ago
-The amount of alcohol in a person's body is measured by
kifflom [539]
The answer to your question is bac
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What are the two perspectives regarding the power of line-item veto?<br> Explain please!
olasank [31]

Congress attempted to grant this power to the president by the Line Item Veto Act of 1996.

<u> Explanation: </u>

The congress of the United States of America has granted certain powers to the president to nullify the part of the bill and that is called line item veto. This can also be termed as partial veto.

The line item veto will give powers to the president to cancel certain provision in the bill and namely budget appropriation bill without vetoing the entire legislative bill.

Supreme Court of America as ruled that it is unconstitutional and it stated that Line Item Veto Act of 1996 has violated the fundamental principle of the presidential clause of the constitution.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If you think anything from your vehicle check could affect your safety or ability to control your car, you should _____.
    6·1 answer
  • Federal appeals courts are also known as circuit courts. True or False
    6·1 answer
  • Richard Mudd, an employee of Compuserve, is called for jury duty in Wayne County, Michigan. His immediate supervisor, Harvey Lor
    14·1 answer
  • Question 9 of 10
    6·2 answers
  • What is an example of a reserved power of the state governments?
    8·1 answer
  • Under the U.S. Constitution, certain powers are given only to the federal government. These are called
    5·1 answer
  • The State of California has decided to improve traffic safety. To do so, law makers look at a variety of options. These options
    7·1 answer
  • Explain in a short and friendly manner, as if presenting to a sixth grade class, the importance of Jean Dominique Larrey.
    5·1 answer
  • Should Nucor have acted promptly to prevent such behavior?
    13·1 answer
  • According to Alexander Hamilton's argument in Federalist No. 78, the best way to ensure that the federal courts exercise their p
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!