1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Kipish [7]
3 years ago
6

“Police and crime commissioners have no real power, their presence is to just keep the public happy” arguments for and against

Law
1 answer:
Jobisdone [24]3 years ago
3 0
For: some people tend to feel safer when higher officials who “solve” crime are present, making people happier they are safe. they can be doing nothing and people would feel at ease knowing if something happens, the police are there to solve the problem

against: police and crime commissioners have too much power, in fact they control the people and abuse it. minorities and poc tend to feel unsafe when police are around bc they use more of their power to control them with fear
You might be interested in
Năng lực pháp luật của pháp nhân, lấy ví dụ và phân tích ví dụ đó (học phần pháp luật đại cương) help me
Mars2501 [29]
Bài tập xác định cấu trúc quy phạm pháp luật (xác định giả định, quy định, chế tài) và phân tích thành phần của quan hệ pháp luật. Ví dụ.
8 0
3 years ago
THIS IS WORTH 25 POINTS
frosja888 [35]

Answer:  D

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
An "imprint" is also know as _____?
ale4655 [162]
D Bc I just did it and got it right
4 0
3 years ago
Over time, the supreme court has been more restrictive in its protection of the right to privacy.
nexus9112 [7]

The Supreme Court has not become more restrictive in protecting the right to privacy, so this claim is false.

We can arrive at this answer because:

  • The Supreme Court understood that the right to privacy is essential to protect citizens, especially those involved in marginalized situations.
  • For this reason, the Supreme Court decided to expand the privacy rights and not restrict them as shown in the question above.

This supreme court attitude is intended to promote greater protection for individuals who are marginalized and who may suffer intolerant and life-threatening attacks.

More information:

brainly.com/question/1145825?referrer=searchResults

8 0
3 years ago
How did early scholars explain the relationships between the physical body and crime
Svetradugi [14.3K]

Answer: Biological theories and Sociological theories

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How many delegates were at the constitutional convention?
    13·1 answer
  • In a contract, each party has what?
    7·2 answers
  • Oklahoma Permit test
    10·1 answer
  • Frank legally divorced his wife last year. His ex-wife has joint ownership of their home and sole custody of their two children.
    12·1 answer
  • What is the Democratic Party's position on taxing business and individuals in the economy?​
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following is not a basic defensive driving skill
    11·1 answer
  • 40. If you can smell gasoline ________
    11·2 answers
  • Allan Pinkerton started out in the business of making barrels, so what did he do when he became interested in how a city works?
    9·1 answer
  • Why is a bill of lading used?
    13·1 answer
  • When meeting a candidate to become your lawyer for the first time, it is important to _____. a. Ask for a guarantee that you are
    13·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!