Since 1cm represents 4 meters then .5cm would represent 2 meters.
Answer:
Given that
is not the easiest equation to solve, and that
the values at the convenient ± 1 sigma,± 2 sigma,± 3 sigma are irrational
using the "rule-of-thumb" "empirical rule" is typically "close enough"
given that the whole probability analysis by definition has some uncertainty in it
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
Answer is $800 assuming that no tax is being applied
Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:
![[ y = x^n\ \ \ => \ \ \ \frac{dy}{dx} = b \cdot x^{n-1} \ ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%20y%20%3D%20x%5En%5C%20%20%5C%20%20%5C%20%3D%3E%20%20%5C%20%20%5C%20%20%5C%20%20%5Cfrac%7Bdy%7D%7Bdx%7D%20%3D%20b%20%5Ccdot%20x%5E%7Bn-1%7D%20%5C%20%5D)
![[\ \frac{u}{v} = \frac{v \dcot u'- u \cdot v'}{v^2}\ ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5B%5C%20%5Cfrac%7Bu%7D%7Bv%7D%20%3D%20%5Cfrac%7Bv%20%5Cdcot%20u%27-%20u%20%5Ccdot%20v%27%7D%7Bv%5E2%7D%5C%20%5D)

