Answer:
a.Georgeland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing clothing.
Explanation:
A country has a comparative advantage in production if it produces at a lower opportunity cost when compared with other countries.
A person has an absolute advantage in production if it produces more quantities of the good when compared with other countries.
Georgeland produces more quantities of both food and clothes when compared to Alland, so it has absolute advantage in both activities .
The opportunity cost of georgeland in producing clothes = 36 / 18=2
The opportunity cost of georgeland producing food = 18 / 36 = 0.5
For Alland,
the opportunity cost of producing clothes = 32 / 16= 2
the opportunity cost of producing food = 16 / 32 = 0.5
Neither countries don't have a comparative advantage in the production of either clothes of food bedside they have the same opportunity costs in both activities.
I hope my answer helps you
Answer:
Just -in-Time(JIT)
Explanation:
Just in time is a lean manufacturing approach through which Organisation manage inventory in such a way that the supplies are received just at the time it is required, just-in-time is one of the key strategies adopted by Toyota in Japan in order to enhance its Efficiency and ensure that it doesn't take the cost of storing inventories in its operations.
Answer:
When the bond is sale at premium, it means the market rate is lower than coupon rate. So investor purchase the bond a higher price until the bond yield equal the market rate
If sold at discount, the market rate is higher than coupon rate. This means it's sold below face value to increase the bond yield to market rate.
YTM if market price is 887 = 10.7366190%
YTM if market price is 1,134.2= 7.1764596%
Explanation:
For the YTM we can calculate an estimated using the following formula:
Where:
C= coupon payment 1,000 x 9% = 90
F= face value of the bonds = 1000
P= market price = 887
n= years to maturity = 10
YTM = 10.7366190%
C= 90
F= 1000
P= 1134.2
n= 10
YTM = 7.1764596%
A more precise answer can be achieve using excle or a financial calculator.
it's half a year out of 5, so 1/10 of the useful lifetime of the van
$61,000 - $4,900 is $56.1000
one tenth of that will be what we are looking for, so option b. should be just right to fit here
Answer:
1. If a firm increases its dividend payout rate the: firm will have less cash available for new investment. True
2. Stock price will likely fall by the same percentage. False
3. Retention ratio will rise at the same rate. False
Explanation:
1. If a firm increases its dividend payout rate the: firm will have less cash available for new investment. This assertion is true because the company would be paying out a larger portion of earnings as dividends, hence the balance portion for new investment will be lower as a result.
2. Stock price will likely fall by the same percentage. This assertion is most unlikely because normally, if a particular stock is paying higher dividends investors will have high expectation and be willing to pay a higher price to buy a stock that pays high dividends
3. Retention ratio will rise at the same rate. This conclusion is also incorrect because pay out ratio and retention ratio have an inverse relationship. If more dividend is paid out, then less money is retained.
