1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xenn [34]
4 years ago
8

How do you do a summary for this srory worth 21 points.​

Social Studies
1 answer:
GaryK [48]4 years ago
8 0

too dark see anything sorry

You might be interested in
Below is an excerpt from the article: Bennett, R. (2005). Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post-1992 university.
nordsb [41]

Answer:

a. During orientations, university staff should be very clear about the importance of academic integrity (Bennett, 2005).

Explanation:

Only option A correctly paraphrases the original sentence without plagiarizing.

Option B is too similar to the original, almost a quotation, so it´s not considered as paraphrasing. Option C is a direct quotation and is missing the quotation marks as well as the author and date. Option D is also a direct quotation and is missing the quotation marks as well as the page number.

Following the author–date citation system in APA Style, every in-text citation should state the author name(s) as well as the year of publication matching the year in the reference list entry. However, only direct quotations should include the page number.

5 0
3 years ago
What ‘policy’ did the ruling in Dred Scott v. Sandford put in place?
Ede4ka [16]
The U.S. Supreme Court hands down its decision on Sanford v. Dred Scott, a case that intensified national divisions over the issue of slavery.

In 1834, Dred Scott, a slave, had been taken to Illinois, a free state, and then Wisconsin territory, where the Missouri Compromise of 1820 prohibited slavery. Scott lived in Wisconsin with his master, Dr. John Emerson, for several years before returning to Missouri, a slave state. In 1846, after Emerson died, Scott sued his master’s widow for his freedom on the grounds that he had lived as a resident of a free state and territory. He won his suit in a lower court, but the Missouri supreme court reversed the decision. Scott appealed the decision, and as his new master, J.F.A. Sanford, was a resident of New York, a federal court decided to hear the case on the basis of the diversity of state citizenship represented. After a federal district court decided against Scott, the case came on appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court, which was divided along slavery and antislavery lines; although the Southern justices had a majority.

During the trial, the antislavery justices used the case to defend the constitutionality of the Missouri Compromise, which had been repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854. The Southern majority responded by ruling on March 6, 1857, that the Missouri Compromise was unconstitutional and that Congress had no power to prohibit slavery in the territories. Three of the Southern justices also held that African Americans who were slaves or whose ancestors were slaves were not entitled to the rights of a federal citizen and therefore had no standing in court. These rulings all confirmed that, in the view of the nation’s highest court, under no condition did Dred Scott have the legal right to request his freedom. The Supreme Court’s verdict further inflamed the irrepressible differences in America over the issue of slavery, which in 1861 erupted with the outbreak of the American Civil War.
3 0
3 years ago
What are three aspects of culture?<br> art language government education beliefs
blsea [12.9K]

Answer:

We can use a current event for this one. Recently, the United States along with a few other countries have expelled Russian diplomats from their countries. Therefore, we have,

"In the recent days, countries like the US and the UK have expelled Russian diplomats from their countries, sparking a global effort to do the same."

This relates to the international organization because it talks about a break of unity between these countries that abrupt;y breaks diplomatic relations that previously were existent and well.

5 0
3 years ago
According to Article I of the Constitution, who has the ability to approve foreign treaties? the Cabinet and the President the H
murzikaleks [220]

Answer:

The Senate

Explanation:

6 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What do business consider positive outcomes of outsourcing
marishachu [46]

Answer:

B.) access to cheaper labor

D.) creation of new jobs in developing markets

E.) potential for higher profits

Explanation:

Got it right on Edge

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • If a baby could be taken by the government and left to die what does this tell you about the real state of women's rights in Spa
    15·2 answers
  • Researchers endeavoring to conduct an on-line study should consider that there are some potential risks of harm to subjects uniq
    11·1 answer
  • What’s the a Average weight of a 5 8 inch man
    9·2 answers
  • Did Taoism begin in India
    14·1 answer
  • What caused people to leave England and to go to America in the 1600s
    5·1 answer
  • What miracle baseball team won the 1969 world series
    8·2 answers
  • How did colonialism affect kenya
    6·1 answer
  • Develop a logical argument for the following question: If the Constitution were up for ratification today, who do you think woul
    6·1 answer
  • Explain how Human Development Index (HDI) are used as indicator to measure development
    9·1 answer
  • If a person fantasizes about the use of force in sexual relationships, one can conclude that?
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!