Answer:
B.
Explanation:
Students listen to a poem that uses cardinal directions. They use a compass rose to help describe locations of places on a world map. A compass is a device that indicates direction. It is one of the most important instruments for navigation. Using a compass to determine direction. ... Direction is also needed to indicate where two points are relative to each other on a map.
Answer:
it is a family of ethical theories that promotes actions that maximize happiness and well being for individuals
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
B I think
Explanation:
B, I think, hope u get it right
Answer:
c
Explanation:
hope it helps it's correct just use our common sense
