Answer:
????
Step-by-step explanation:
,$,$,$,$,$,$,#$,#,$,
<span><span><span><span><span>(<span>5+4</span>)</span><span>(2)</span></span>+6</span>−<span><span>(2)</span><span>(2)</span></span></span>−1</span><span>=<span><span><span><span><span>(9)</span><span>(2)</span></span>+6</span>−<span><span>(2)</span><span>(2)</span></span></span>−1</span></span><span>=<span><span><span>18+6</span>−<span><span>(2)</span><span>(2)</span></span></span>−1</span></span><span>=<span><span>24−<span><span>(2)</span><span>(2)</span></span></span>−1</span></span><span>=<span><span>24−4</span>−1</span></span><span>=<span>20−1</span></span><span>=<span>19</span></span>
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
If the new height is 338m and the helicopter decended 127m to get to that new height then the original height is simply the sum of them both.
H = 338m + 127m
H = 465m
Answer:
correct answer is 406/25+a10
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>
Answer: Choice C) 421.9</h3>
=======================================
Explanation:
You're on the right track. You wrote down the proper expression to get the final answer, assuming you meant to write 75/4 as the third term inside the parenthesis. This works because each time you cut the side length in half to get each smaller triangle's side. The 3 is because there are 3 sides for each of the triangles. Much of this I have a feeling you already know as you wrote down the expression on the page, though I'm not 100% sure of your mindset. Computing this expression leads to 421.875 which rounds to 421.9
note: an alternative is to write 3*75 + 3*75/2 + 3*75/4 + 3*75/8, though that is more work. It's better to have that 3 factored out.
