Answer:
Mark should include in the letter to avoid litigation charges:
Specific facts about the consultant that can be verified.
Explanation:
False information, sentiment-hurting statements, or personal opinions about the consultant's character should never be found in formal letters that are meant to offer constructive criticisms. This means that only specific facts that are verifiable should be included. Formal letters are not avenues for character defamation. They are called "formal" because they must stick to specific and relevant official purposes.
Answer:
general partnership
Explanation:
General partnership -
It refers to the management of a particular business , by two or more partners in a predefined manner , where the profit is shares equally amongst the partners , is referred to as general partnership .
The decision about the business is taken along with all the partners ,like the financial decisions.
Any loss or profit is shares equally amongst all .
Hence , from the given scenario of the question ,
Sandra and Clara enters into a general partnership .
Answer:
Option B. Units completed and transferred to finished goods
&
Option C. Units in ending work in process inventory
Explanation:
The reason is that the Equivalent units of Production that include number of units that would have been completed if all the efforts required were applied to the product completion which are the products started and finished during the period. The definition clearly states that the units considered would be the one that are shifted to finished goods from work in progress state in the current year or the one which is at work in progress state.
In the nutshell, the only units that would be considered in the assignment of the cost in the Step 4 will be either Work in Progress (Option C) or the Finished Goods that is shifted to Work in Progress (Option B).
1 5/7 would be the quotient
Payable=outcome
receive=Income
