1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Amiraneli [1.4K]
3 years ago
9

The E Company has sold five million toasters. There have never been any safety problems with the toasters. One toaster, for no a

pparent reason, electrocutes the son of a woman who bought the toaster In a suit against the E Company for the death, the company is likely to be held:______.
a. not liable because one in five million toasters is evidence of high quality, not a safety problem
b. not liable because the toaster was purchased by the woman, not her son, so there is no right to sue
c. not liable because of assumption of the risk, a reasonable person knows that using an electrical appliance could result in injury
d. liable in strict liability based on a manufacturing defect theory e. liable in strict liability based on a design defect theory
Business
1 answer:
Roman55 [17]3 years ago
7 0

Answer: D. liable in strict liability based on a manufacturing defect theory.

Explanation: The company can be held liable based on manufacturing defect theory, if it is proved that it was because of a manufacturing defect on that particular toaster that lead to the dead of the boy.

Since the woman's son was electrocuted by the toaster for no apparent reason the company will be held liable for the dead of the boy.

You might be interested in
Reese, a calendar-year taxpayer, uses the cash method of accounting for her sole proprietorship. In late December, she received
muminat

Answer:

a. What is the after-tax cost if she pays the $39,000 bill in December?

= $23,000 x (1 - 32%) = $15,640

b. What is the after-tax cost if she pays the $39,000 bill in January? (Do not round intermediate calculations. Round your answer to the nearest whole dollar amount.)

total after tax cost (including investment revenue):

= $23,000 x (1 - 37%) = $14,490

= -$23,000 x 7% x 1/12 x (1 - 37%) = -$84.53

= $14,405.47

c. Should Reese pay the $23,000 bill'in December or January?

January , since the after tax cost is lower

d. What is the after-tax cost if she expects her marginal tax rate to be 24 percent next year and pays the $23,000 bill in January?

= $23,000 x (1 - 24%) = $17,480

= -$23,000 x 7% x 1/12 x (1 - 24%) = -$101.97

= $17,378.03

e. Should Reese pay the $23,000 bill in December or January if she expects her marginal tax rate to be 32 percent this year and 24 percent next year?

December, since the after tax cost is lower

3 0
3 years ago
Which of the following statements is correct regarding compensation expense for employers in publicly traded corporations?
Sliva [168]

Answer:

d. Deductible compensation expense must be considered reasonable under the facts and circumstances of the employment.

Explanation:

Elon Musks collected billions of dollars due to the excellent performance of Tesla's stocks. The compensation awarded to the CEO, CFO and maximum three other executives must be reasonable. Performance based compensation is not limited in an amount, instead they are limited on the number of people that receive them.

3 0
3 years ago
Great Skin Inc. is establishing a pricing strategy for a new moisturizer. The total cost to produce each unit is $3.50. The comp
dolphi86 [110]
Break even idk tbh bruh it’s said wrong answer
3 0
3 years ago
A common defense known as _______ arises when a consumer knows that a defect exists but still proceeds unreasonably to make use
melomori [17]

Answer:

The correct answer is: Assumption of the risk.

Explanation:

If the risk inherent in a particular action that caused an injury is knowingly and voluntarily assumed, you cannot sue anyone to recover the damages. Suppose, for example, a situation in which he went to a friend's house and was warned about the use of the back door because the floor cover was seriously damaged and would not support a person's weight on it. If you have decided to ignore the warning and use the back door, the doctrine of risk taking will probably prevent the recovery of injuries sustained by a fall on that floor. The court will decide that you "assumed the risk" of such injury.

4 0
3 years ago
Karen Blumenthall was seriously injured in a car accident and is paralyzed from the waist down. Luckily she has an insurance pol
ruslelena [56]
Hi, ill help u out c:
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A corporation has 12,000 shares of $20 par stock outstanding that has a current market value of $150. If the corporation issues
    11·1 answer
  • Define quality assurance?
    6·2 answers
  • An increase in private goods, such as cars, typically leads to an increased need for public services, such as parking spaces. Gr
    13·1 answer
  • Anchor Co. owns 40% of Main Co.'s common stock outstanding and 75% of Main's noncumulative preferred stock outstanding. Anchor e
    9·1 answer
  • The four components of gdp are consumer spending, business investment, government spending, and
    11·1 answer
  • _____ refers to activities to plan, organize, lead, and control the flow of products, services, finances, and information that p
    5·2 answers
  • Which of the following is NOT a benefit of using direct deposit for your paycheck or state/federal benefits?
    6·1 answer
  • Differentiate between manmade and natural attraction​
    15·1 answer
  • Shalimar Company manufactures and sells industrial products. For next year, Shalimar has budgeted the following sales:
    12·1 answer
  • How does work ethic assist a school leaver to become a successful business owner​
    15·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!