Answer:
लेख्नुहोस। नयाँ ब्यब्साय विभिन्न विधि हरु ब्य्ख्य गर्नुहोस
Explanation:
Answer:
This is known as a "bait and switch" pricing tactic :)
<span>During
the introduction stage of the product life cycle, promotional
expenditures are made to stimulate consumer desire for an entire product
class rather than for a specific brand. The consumer desire that is
stimulated is referred to as primary demand.
</span>Primary demand is the desire for a product class rather than for a specific brand.During the growth stage
of the product life cycle, promotional expenditures are made to
stimulate consumer desire for a specific brand due to increased
competition. The consumer desire that is stimulated is referred to as selective demand.<span>Selective demand is the preference for a specific brand.</span>
Answer:
Yes, Dealer could collect damages from GM because basically GM breached the contract. Any time a contract is breached, the non-breaching party can sue. But the real question here is what amount could the court assign to Dealer as compensation for damages incurred. If you want to rephrase this question, it would be: What damages did Dealer suffer due to GM's breach.
If the damages are not significant, then the court will probably assign some amount for nominal damages. To be honest, the greatest expenses here are actually the legal costs of the lawsuit. Unless Dealer can prove that assigning the contract actually hurt them (which I doubt), then the court will assign a small amount. Sometimes nominal damages can be very small and mostly symbolic, e.g. $1.
Answer: The correct answers are "decrease" and "decrease".
Explanation: Some policymakers have argued that products like cigarettes, alcohol, and sweetened soda generate negative externalities in consumption. All else equal, if the government decided to impose a tax on soda, the equilibrium quantity of soda would <u>decrease</u> and the equilibrium price of soda would <u>decrease.</u>