Answer: I believe the answer to your question is 4
Step-by-step explanation:
My belief is that km is smaller than m so 3.6km is less than 3600m i hope my answer helps you in some sort of way
I believe A. would be the answer
SORRY IF WRONG
Answer:yes imStep-by-step explanation:
Answer:
C. volume
Step-by-step explanation:
The response variable in this scenario would be the volume of the usable lumber. That is because this variable depends completely on the height of the cherry trees that are being measured. The higher that the cherry trees are the more volume can be expected to get from cutting these trees down. The opposite goes for trees that are smaller, they would decrease the total expected volume that will be received from the usable lumber since there would be less amount of tree to cut down.