Can you put more details in
1. The idea behind the concept of multiple intelligences is that human intelligence can take different "modalities," as opposed to being dominated by a single general ability. I think this is a valid construct, as it approaches the concept of "intelligence" from various different angles, not always considered when discussing intelligence in other contexts.
2. As we do not have access to this text, we are not able to answer this section of the question.
3. One way in which the developers of a test of multiple intelligences could demonstrate the validity of the test using evidence would be by also researching the behaviour of the people who took the test out in the real world. They could compare these results to the results of the test. In this way, they would be more likely to find out whether the intelligences mentioned in the test are indeed exercised in real life.
4. A passage from the Bible that could support this idea would be the following:
<em>1 Corinthians 12:12-14 – "Just as a body, though one, has many parts, but all its many parts form one body, so it is with Christ. For we were all baptised by one Spirit so as to form one body—whether Jews or Gentiles, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink. Even so the body is not made up of one part but of many."</em>
In this passage, the idea of many parts within a single body is presented. However, it is also stated that the many parts of the body in fact end up forming a single entity. This is similar to the multiple intelligences that combine to give a single personality capable of certain things.
Answer: Prosecutor
Explanation:
A prosecutor is a lawyer who tries to prove in court whether a person is guilty or charge the person for crime.
So it's a prosecutor who can provide information, advise to investigators about legal issues, search and seizures, warrants, confession and admissibility of evidence.
lawyer who decides whether to charge a person with a crime and tries to prove in court that the person is guilty.
I believe the answer is: Consistent.
When people already determine the view that they have about themselves, they would most likely treat any critize or new information about their character as a challenge and often make justification for our own flaw.
Due this unlikeliness to change, the view ofte remained consistent throughout the years.<span />
2. Republican President= B. Dwight D. Eisenhower
3. a person who currently holds an office= F. incumbent
4. Democratic President= A. Jimmy Carter
6. to yield or surrender; admit or acknowledge= E. concede
1. formed by Theodore Roosevelt in 1912= C.Bull Moose Party
5. formed by Ross Perot in 1992= D. United We Stand Party
