Answer:
The most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.
Explanation:
When there isn't a statute, the buyer bears the risk of loss when property subject to a contract for sale is destroyed without fault of any party prior to the date specified for closing. Unless the contract specifies otherwise, the buyer must pay the contract price even if the property is damaged by fire.
The inn was burned down in this case after the landowner and the buyer signed a contract for the sale of the property, but before the closing date. The contract appears to be silent on the risk of loss, and no appropriate statute exists. As a result of the common law rule, the buyer bears the risk of loss. Therefore, the landowner has the right to particular execution of the contract, which implies that the entire stipulated contract price must be paid by the buyer.
Regardless of the property's drop in worth owing to the fire, the $1 million contract price must be paid by the buyer because he bears the risk of loss.
Therefore, the most likely result at trial is that the landowner's claim for specific performance will be successful, and she will be awarded the entire price of contract.
Answer:
14-Jan
Dr Trade Receivable $1,125
Cr Sales
14-jan
Dr Cost of sales 625
Cr Inventory 625
9-Apr
Dr Inventory 375
Cr Trade Payable 375
2-Sep
Dr Trade Receivable $2,500
Cr Sales $2,500
2 sep
Dr Cost of sales $1,375
Cr Inventory $1,375
Dec 31 No journal entry
Explanation:
Preparation to Records the month-end journal entries noted below, assuming the company uses a periodic inventory system
14-Jan
Dr Trade Receivable $1,125
Cr Sales (45*25)
14-jan
Dr Cost of sales[25*25] 625
Cr Inventory 625
9-Apr
Dr Inventory (25*$15) 375
Cr Trade Payable 375
2-Sep
Dr Trade Receivable $2,500
Cr Sales (50*50) $2,500
2 Sep
Dr Cost of sales $1,375
Cr Inventory $1,375
($2,500-$1,125)
Dec 31 No journal entry
This attitude reflects ageism.
It is a type of discrimination based on somebody's age - even though Susan is more experienced than her young daughter when it comes to this job, Beverly got the job because she is younger. So, Susan has been discriminated against because she is way older than Beverly.
Answer: -$100
Explanation:
Value of forward contract = Selling price - Forward price on bond
Forward price = Present value of cashflows + Present value of bond
Periodic rate = 7%/ 2 = 3.5% per semi annum
= 8% / 2 = 4%
3.5% will be used to discount the payment 6 months from now as that is the 6 month rate. The rest will be 4%.
= (80 / (1 + 3.5%) ) + ( 80 / ( 1 + 4%)²) + (940 / ( 1 +4%)²)
= $1,020.342
= $1,020
Value of forward contract = 920 - 1,020
= -$100
