Answer:
Explanation:
Although it has been attempted to overturn the ruling in the Helling case, I would suppose that these attempts have been unsuccessful because the ruling was in favor of a higher standard of care than what was deemed appropriate by for the ophthalmologists. One might argue that the ruling has remained in place because holding the defendants liable was, in a way, a step towards checking the medical profession’s privilege to set it’s own standards. I feel as though legislature has probably not seen fit to reinforce it because the original ruling remains valid in that a doctor can follow all of the standards of care, and still be liable.
Answer: True
Explanation:
In the Second World War, the two main groups opposing each other were the Allies and the Axis powers.
The Allies comprised of various nations as the war progressed. The main ones however were the United Kingdom and her empire and the United States. France can be considered part of the group because of their government in exile but the puppet Vichy government was on the German side.
The Axis powers included the dictatorial nations of Germany, Italy and Japan, These nations conquered massive territories at the start of the war but the Allies kept recapturing these lands until the war ended in Allied victory.
Answer:
Treatment and control groups. In experimental research, some subjects are administered one or more experimental stimulus called a treatment the treatment group while other subjects are not given such a stimulus the control group
Explanation:
Answer:
A petition must contain at least one signature, and every signature must be original hand-writing and must not be pasted on, photocopied or transferred in any way. Every person signing a petition must write their full address after their signature
Explanation:
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Declarations against interest are an exception to the rule on hearsay in which a person's statement may be used, where generally the content of the statement is so prejudicial to the person making it that he would not have made the statement unless he believed the statement was true.
And statements are usually made in court.
Statement Offered Against a Party That Wrongfully Caused the Declarant’s Unavailability. A statement offered against a party that wrongfully caused — or acquiesced in wrongfully causing — the declarant’s unavailability as a witness, and did so intending that result.
is exempted from testifying about the subject matter of the declarant’s statement because of the court rules
