The most common justification of police officer corruption exists in the rotten-apple statement that the officer alone stands as deviant.
<h3>What are the responses about police misconduct?</h3>
The most common justification of police officer corruption exists in the rotten-apple statement that the officer alone stands as deviant. This argument extends to rotten bushels-groups of officials banding together to commit deviant actions.
Most often when we listen about police misconduct, it's due to instances of extreme use of force, brutality, lawlessness, coercive interrogations, witness tampering, or racial profiling. These actions can result in physical harm or death, wrongful imprisonment, and infringement of constitutional rights.
Incidents of unethical or criminal misconduct can influence the officer's capability to testify in both criminal and civil trials. In addition, such incidents may result in direct civil liability for the agency and may impact the agency's capability to protect itself in other, irrelevant civil trials.
To learn more about police misconduct refer to:
brainly.com/question/15022635
#SPJ9
Answer:
The person should play an important role in history.
A lo because we also use the roman numerals
Answer:
This is wan answer that depends on a personal idea, but I’ll help you out.
Explanation:
During the Great Depression, Americans were suffering because there was a shortage of moeny. Perhaps you could provide stimulus checks to the citizens, or maybe even print more money? Try looking up what they were having trouble with during that time, and look at what the president did. You could base your answer off of that.
