-3 > x
The values that make this inequality true are those that are less than -3. The inequality does not include -3.
0.63 is the correct answer
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
I'm assuming you meant to type in
because you can only have removable discontinuities where there is a rational (fraction) function. Begin by factoring both the numerator and denominator to
and cancelling out like terms would have us eliminating the (x + 3). That is where there is a removable discontinuity. It leaves a hole. The other discontinuity, (x + 1) doesn't cancel out so it is a non-removable discontuinity, which is a vertical asymptote.
The removable discontinuity is at -3. There is no y value at x = -3 (remember there's only a hole here), because -3 causes the denominator to go to 0 and we all know that having a 0 in the denominator of a fraction is a big no-no!!!
Based on the given condition Diego utilized, it can be said that he used multiplication property when he multiplied both sides of the equation by 6 and then substitution property when he substituted 6 to the original equation.
(c) Multiplication property of equality and substitution property of equality
Answer:
8.34/1
Step-by-step explanation:
