1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Salsk061 [2.6K]
3 years ago
5

What does Arrow's theorem teach us about Democratic elections?

Law
1 answer:
NARA [144]3 years ago
4 0
Everyone gets a say, everyone has a voice even if u can’t speak, also it’s a fair choice on elections
You might be interested in
A case goes to trial, the case must take place where?<br> a cas<br> case mus
Brums [2.3K]

Answer:

In a crimanal trial it would be where the jursdicion is

4 0
3 years ago
Write short note on prohibition​
zmey [24]

Answer:  Prohibition is a law or restriction that has been put in place to counteract something from happening. This is primarily legal in nature, and put into place by legislative power.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Given the advent of good-faith exceptions to the exclusionary rule, the plain-view doctrine, and the U.S. Supreme Court's recogn
pshichka [43]

Answer:

The exclusionary rule prevents the government from using most evidence gathered in violation of the United States Constitution.  The decision in Mapp v. Ohio established that the exclusionary rule applies to evidence gained from an unreasonable search or seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment. The decision in Miranda v. Arizona established that the exclusionary rule applies to improperly elicited self-incriminatory statements gathered in violation of the Fifth Amendment, and to evidence gained in situations where the government violated the defendant's Sixth Amendment right to counsel.  However, the rule does not apply in civil cases, including deportation hearings. See INS v. Lopez-Mendoza.

3 0
3 years ago
MPORTACIA DE LOS DERECHOS AUTORALES?
MA_775_DIABLO [31]
The importance of your rights?
5 0
3 years ago
Discuss the reliability of the analytical scientist in the quart room.
ValentinkaMS [17]

1)They are very reliable because they are almost always accurate.All science in the courtroom has to be verified in order to be used in the court to prove that their tests are accurate and reliable and can be used as an evidence in court. Reliability is measured by how much your machines have been validated ,if a forensic scientist in a court say the evidence is true but did not have a proper reliability , than people can question how true this test can actually be. Hard science is consisted of chemistry,biology and physics are the most reliable evidence.

2)The reliability of the analytical science in the courtroom is growing. This is because of the fact that analytical science involves comparison between the characteristics and features of the suspected specimens with those obtained from the criminals or victims. The analytical science plays an important role in proving a fact that a crime has been committed, the place of crime and establishing the identity of the culprit.

HOPE THIS HELPS..

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • 38. How many justices/judges are on the Supreme Court? *
    8·1 answer
  • What level of government gets most of its revenue from income tax?
    5·1 answer
  • 3 points
    7·1 answer
  • Qué relación puedes establecer en las siguientes palabras? igualda, apego a la legalidad, no discriminación
    7·1 answer
  • Can animal wildlife protection be an amendment, or do amendment have to affect humans?
    11·1 answer
  • Importance of ubuntu in our democratic society​
    9·1 answer
  • HURRY PLSS
    8·1 answer
  • An important duty of the president is
    11·2 answers
  • What is the difference between direct democracy and republic?
    11·1 answer
  • Which Florida county courts hear misdemeanor criminal cases?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!