To help Hope overcome her fear of riding an elevator, her therapist is using systematic desensitization.
<h3 /><h3>What is systematic desensitization?</h3>
It corresponds to a therapeutic approach whose focus is on promoting the patient's relaxation through techniques that expose him in a hierarchical way to his fears and traumas, to be gradually overcome.
Therefore, the systematic desensitization approach is effective in helping to treat phobias by altering the patient's operant conditioning.
Find out more about systematic desensitization here:
brainly.com/question/14263540
#SPJ1
Eastern Europe has the highest Muslim population. Im not sure if it would be the same considering your choices are southeastern europe
<u>Answer:</u>
With Facilitative leadership style, the leader presents the problem to a group of employees and seeks consensus on a solution, making sure that his or her own opinion receives no more weight than anyone else's.
<u>Explanation:</u>
- The act of leading group of people or organization is called a leadership. Facilitative leadership is goal oriented.
- It helps to build understanding among team member even if there is conflicting view.
- Member of team possess quality, wisdom, experience and the facilitator helps to bring these to the group.
- There is a proper coordination in a group. Group discussion is goal oriented.
- Facilitative make and implement decision and achieve high quality result.
Answer:
Capulet will not allow a well-mannered guest to be insulted in his home.
Explanation:
There is no objective answer to this question, as both sides have arguments that support their views.
If you believe that you are bound by Hobbes' argument, it is because of tacit consent. Tacit consent means that, even though you have not explicitly agreed to follow laws, you have indicated your agreement through other means, for example, by using the public services of the government or by remaining within the limits of your country. Also, you could argue that any rational person would prefer to follow the rules of the government than to live in the state of nature. Therefore, if you are rational, your consent is assumed. Finally, you could also argue that while you did not explicitly agreed, maybe your ancestors did, which still binds you as a member of the same society.
On the other hand, if you believe that you are not bound by Hobbes' argument, you could argue that any contract that is not freely agreed upon is not valid. As the government uses force to make you act according to the law, you cannot be considered to be freely consenting. Also, you can argue that agreeing to follow some rules does not imply following <em>all</em> of the laws of the country. Finally, a common argument against Hobbes is the lack of empirical data. As we do not know if the state of nature is actually bad, or if the contract ever happened, the government cannot gain its legitimacy in that way.
