Answer:
Experimenter, participant
Explanation:
Experimenter expectancy effects can be described or considered as an error in the scientific findings or inquiries, where the researchers' expectations concerning their enquiries or findings are made known unconsciously to the subjects or participant, and this will automatically influence their responses.
This is also known as the object expectancy effect.
The subject or participant expectancy effect occurs when the result being expected by the participants or subjects unconsciously affect the expected result.
It should be noted that the experimental expectancy effect can be prevented by double-blind design. Double-blind design is a situation where both the experimenter and the participant do not know the subject identity.
The participant expectancy effect can be prevented by a single-blind design, where the subject is not aware if he/she is the experimental test object.
Answer:
Catal Huyuk was a large city that gouses many people.
<span>- Hard to travel in the north due to Sahara desert. People had to follow the coastline to get past the deserts.
- Trade mainly along Nile and Niger rivers to transport goods</span>
Answer:
Instinctive drift
Explanation:
Instinctive drift is a phenomenon that occurs when an animal reverts back to instinctual behaviour, instead of continuing engaing in learned, or trained behaviour.
In this case, the cat's trained behaviour is being hampered by instinctive drift because while it can easily follow Juan's instructions when jumping a food (aided by the great incentive of getting food), it cannot help chasing the ball more than once, because rolling a ball to catch it is a highly instinctual behaviour that the cat practically cannot control.
The basic aim in a direct democracy is majority rule.
