A remedy whereby a court orders a change in a written document to reflect what it ought to have said in the first place is known as what reformation.
<h3>What is reformation?</h3>
This is when there is an alteration to an already tendered document in a court so that it can show the true picture of events. The purpose of rectification is to make amendment of legal document due to mistakes made by the parties involved.
In other words, rectification in contract law takes place when a court demands a modification in a contract so that the contract states what it should have stated originally.
- Reformation may be granted in cases in which the instrument sought to be rectified constitutes the only agreement between the parties but does not reflect their common intention.
- It is is available if the parties intended to give effect to the whole of initial agreement in the written contract.
Learn more about reformations here: brainly.com/question/894611
#SPJ1
Many companies always look out for the consumer and give them repayment plans that can be paid off in the shortest amount of time. - False
<u>Explanation:</u>
The main aim of any business is to gain profit from the products or services that they sell to their customers. They must attain the money that they invested in that particular product's production, raw materials, labors,etc. When a company decides to sell any of its products or services at free of cost during the selling point and accept to get it back in any time after that it will be a big loss to them.
This is because the value of money that we get today will not be same as the value of money in future. He can accept to get paid for the products and services sold to a consumer at least in installments. But, any company selling products will never keep on looking for the customers for payments through some repayment plans.
Answer:
for sure, person B wouldn't be charged with murder
Explanation:
because person B was basically forced to do it by person A, the charge would prolly go to person A
Introduction
Poverty turns persistent when there is great, increasing wealth elsewhere. According to the human rights theory of liberal individualism, the rich people of any society must have perfect freedom to increase their wealth, and go on increasing it, freedom being “a distinctive feature of the liberal individualist project.” On the other hand, the theory of communitarianism demands of the rich to respect the human rights of poor people in their quest for greater wealth. Poor folks are oft described as “oppressed,” and the rich are usually identified as the perpetrators of oppression. Hence, the practice of liberal individualism by the rich must be considered a moral crisis for society, if in fact the rich have been getting richer at the expense of the poor, as it happens in South Korea.
After all, poverty is known to rob the afflicted of their basic human rights, such as access to clean water, food, shelter, healthcare and acquirement of good quality education. Such people are described as ‘underprivileged.’ As the following case study of poverty and income inequality shows, even though Asia has a collectivistic culture where communitarianism should be fully applied, whereas liberal individualism is considered a theory applicable in the West alone, the ‘underprivileged’ abound in South Korea. Had collectivism or communitarianism not been combined with the practice of liberal individualism on the part of the rich and the powerful in South Korea, poverty and income inequality would have been nonexistent. While it is true that South Korea works to resolve these issues in the spirit of communitarianism, it remains a fact that liberal individualism is practiced by the rich people of South Korea in addit...
