Answer: The origin of the case was somewhat trivial, but had great implications for the role of the Supreme Court in government. Marbury was appointed by John Adams, the president before Madison, as a district judge in Washington DC. When Madison became president, he didn't deliver the papers to finalize Marbury's appointment.
Marbury took him to Court, and although the Court initially sided with Marbury, the court, with John Marshall serving as Chief Justice, ultimately determined that the law that allowed Marbury to take the case to court was not constitutional. This meant that the law was struck down.
This was the first incidence of the Supreme Court exercising judicial review, the review of laws to determine constitutionality and their rejection if they are not, in the history of the United States. It was a landmark case not for the spat between Marbury and Madison over a district judgeship, but because it marked a huge expansion of the power of the Supreme Court (and thus the judicial branch).
We have seen the power of judicial review exercised in many cases since this one, such as Miranda vs Arizona (which established the law that police must read you your 'Miranda Rights' when they arrest you) and Plessy vs Ferguson, which determined that laws governing "seperate but equal" facilities for people of different races were in theory inherently unequal, and in practice clearly offered worse facilities to people of color.
The society's members. This is because the perspective of the functionalist lies mostly on the social consensus among the members of the society. With this, functionalists believe that the people are the ones who make the society through their own acts of making the society prosper.
The answer is B. mother.
The statue symbolizes a mother who welcomes those who have left their
homes in search of a better in the United States of America. To this day, the Statue of Liberty is looked
upon that way by those immigrate to the U.S.
Answer:
The answer is negative reinforcement.
Explanation:
In operant conditioning, negative reinforcement occurs when an unpleasant stimulus is removed after a behaviour is completed. In the example, the nagging will stop once the job has been done.
Negative reinforcement has been proved to be more effective than positive reinforcement (rewards).
Answer:
analysis paralysis
Explanation:
Analysis paralysis: The term "analysis paralysis" is also referred as "paralysis by analysis" and is described as a process in which an individual or a group of people tends to overthink or overanalyze a particular situation that can cause or leads to "forward motion" or the decision-making process becomes 'paralyzed' i.e, no course of action or solution is being decided upon.
In the question above, Kenneth is most likely experiencing the phenomenon known as 'analysis paralysis'.
