Answer:
The correct answer is: D) There are also genes for RNAs other than mRNA.
Explanation:
<u>If the genome of a species has </u><u>20,000 protein-coding regions</u><u>, this implies that there are </u><u>regions with genes that do not code for proteins</u><u>, but for other RNA molecules (like</u><u> rRNA</u><u>, which forms the ribosomes, and</u><u> tRNA</u><u> - both important elements in the process of translation). </u>
Just because there are 20,000 protein-coding genes, it doesn't mean that there aren't any other genes. Most genomes are composed of coding regions and non-coding regions - and some coding regions may code to things that are not proteins as well! So option A is incorrect.
There are 20,000 genes that code for proteins in this species, but there's no data about how many proteins this species has. 1 gene can be used to synthesize different proteins. Option B is incorrect.
Even if there are 20,000 protein-coding regions, there's no evidence in the nature of the rest of the genes, so they could be coding or non-coding genes. Option C is incorrect.
Just because a species' DNA has many regions that code for proteins, it doesn't mean that is highly evolved.