Incomplete question. The options;
A) Incorporate activities that directly involve the audience.
B) Explain how the information will help the audience.
C) Avoid jargon.
D) Compare unfamiliar concepts to familiar concepts.
Answer:
<u>C) Avoid jargon.</u>
Explanation:
Note, the term <em>"jargon"</em> basically refers to the use of highly complex or technical language in communication.
In this scenario, we observed that Adam did not take into consideration that the interns were<em> unfamiliar</em> with the complex terms he was using. Hence, an effective strategy he could have used in the above situation was to totally avoid the use of jargon in his communication with the interns.
Answer:
D) $500 loss
Explanation:
The computation of the realized value on the investment is shown below:
= Number of shares × premium
= 100 shares × $5
= $500 loss
Since the call is for 125 shares for $125 and the selling price per share is $123 due to which the contract is not implemented. So the premium amount would be recorded as a loss of $500
Answer:
a.) Nukere should be held liable because of the dangerous nature of hazardous waste. Regardless of safety checks, the accident happened.
Explanation:
"Nuclear power plants" are known to be<em> the most reliable source of electricity</em> there is in the world. However, they pose some<em> risks</em> especially when it comes to the possibility of a nuclear accident happening.
When it comes to "nuclear third party liability," a strict liability of the nuclear operator means that the victim has no fault in any situation that might occur. This means that <em>the operator is responsible or liable</em> of the power plant's dangerous nature of hazardous wastes.
Whether or not they have recently passed safety checks, there is no need for them to prove anything on he is at fault. So, <u>this makes Nukere liable for the situation.</u>
This explains the answer.
Answer:
the best possible answer is keep the marginal costs below marginal revenue.
Answer: consumers acting as brand advocates
Explanation:
A consumer is less likely to act as a brand advocate. An advocate to someone is a person that speaks on behalf of someone or acts as an intermediate between a person he is representing and another. An advocate role is not the job of a consumer.
