Answer:
It became a world power, It added Hawaii as a state and became isolated from the rest of the world.
Answer: This demonstrate the principle of "GENOCIDE"
Explanation: Genocide is the killing or maltreatment of a group of people in a country or the same ethnic group.
Genocide is when the leadership of a country of a group suppress his people to become his subject, by killing them and maltreating them to death.
If the leadership of a sovereign states say he wants the mess with his people, that means he wants to maltreat or kill his people on his own will. This is referred to genocide, because he has no legal right as a leader to kill the people he leads. The citizens of a country are the people subject to the soveregn laws of the leadership of that country.
For a leader to ask for such authority, that means the leader has an intentions of killing or maltreating his people. Genocide is always against human right, and the world will stand against any nation that deprives his people from their human rights.
Answer:
b)
Explanation:
A hookup culture is a culture that accepts and encourages casual sex encounters, like one-night stands, without including emotional bonding or a long term commitment. A hookup can actually has many meanings that go from kissing to foreplay and oral sex. The main point in a hookup is the lack of emotional bonding or commitment.
According to different researches, this culture is highly interrelated with alcohol and other drug use, since the use of these substances can disinhibit sexual behaviors leading to hookups.
Thus, the correct answer would be b)
<u>Note: </u>
<u>a) This culture is not likely to be embraced by religious students since religion often doesn't approve these kind of behaviors.</u>
<u>c) It doesn't have to do with gender, so it's not the preferred relationship started for female college students.</u>
<u>d) Since there are risks in this culture, it's not supported by parent and college administrators. </u>
<u />
<u />
The last sentence because it already stated that it has a pattern of bad weather.
Incomplete/unclear question. The correct question read;
<u>88% </u>of all Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend. P2: Booze-Head is a Rutgers/Newark student. Can it be inductively concluded that Booze-Head will not get drunk this weekend?
Answer:
<u>No</u>
Explanation:
<em>Remember,</em> inductive reasoning is often based on<u> broad generalizations from specific observations.</u>
So since from this scenario, a broad generalization was made that <u>88% </u>of Rutgers/Newark students will get drunk this weekend, it seems <u>unlikely </u>and illogical that Booze will not be among those getting drunk on the weekend.
