Answer:
1) B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s.
2) A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported.
Step-by-step explanation:
The distribution table is shown below:
Last Digit Frequency
0 9
1 1
2 1
3 3
4 1
5 11
6 1
7 0
8 3
9 1
1. Based on the distribution table, we see a very disproportionate distribution. There is a high frequency of 0's and 5's. This lays credence to the heights being reported rather than measured. As such, option B is the correct answer
<u>B. The height appear to be reported because there are disproportionately more 0s and 5s</u>.
2. Since the heights were reported and not measured, they are most certainly not accurate. The conclusion is that the result is not accurate. As such, option A is the correct answer
<u>A. They are likely not very accurate because they appear to be reported</u>.
8.1 I think but there's an app called, tiger something and it tells,you the answers
Answer:
26 cm
Step-by-step explanation:
Please give me brainliest ;)
Answer: 1/4
Step-by-step explanation:
To determine the probability of landing on blue, you divide by the total number of spins.
In this experiment, the probability of the spinner landing on blue after 20 spins would be 15%.
This makes the probability of landing on blue to be:
Pr (landing on blue) / Pr (total trials) = 5/20
This gives 1/4
