Answer:
C) The theory of Comparative Advantage
Explanation:
The theory of Comparative Advantage is a theory of international trade and it comes into effect in a situation where the <u>opportunity cost of producing a good or offering by a service by a country is lower than that of other countries. </u>
Specifically, to understand the theory of comparative advantage the opportunity cost of production or offering a service has to be measured in terms of the trade off between those countries. It simply means when a country has the comparative advantage then it derives more benefits from other countries buying its products as compared to buying their products and vice versa.
In the question, the European Union has the Comparative advantage over South Africa because the trade-off between buying South Africa's edible fruits and nuts and selling other products to South Africa benefits the European countries.
European countries derive more benefits because South Africa buys their goods at a cost higher than it takes them to produce while they buy at the normal cost from South Africa. The <u>trade-off benefits Europe </u>
Answer:
organizational story
Explanation:
Heidi Ganahl -
She is a very famous author , businesswomen and entrepreneur , the very founder of the Camp Bow Wow , which is a franchise for pet care.
Heidi Ganahl is characterised as an organizational story for her franchise Camp Bow Wow , where the people working in the camp Bow Wow all listen to the inspirational stories of her life , and feel motivated to do the same .
Hence , from the given information of the question,
The correct term is organizational story .
How would you suggest that Alliant measure the effects of a diverse workforce?
Different background and more diversity can contribute for new strategies and innovation for the company. The effects of diversity can be directly quantified after hiring more diverse people into a determined sector and by comparing the profits before and after hiring. In other words, the UX of a product made by a company mostly with individuals from a social group A cannot easily design a product which a group B can identify themselves.
For example, the design of a woman intimate personal care products made exclusively by man might originate products which aren't that good as designed products made by a diverse group man and woman.
If a company ignored workforce diversity, how might it be affected?
The company can stuck into a non-creative solution and/or stays in sector without innovation. A company without innovation might be fragile to the competition companies.
<span>Prefer the 6.1 percent tax-exempt investment.
Let's do the math and see why the tax-exempt investment is the better choice. For the 8.1% taxable investment, you get taxed at the rate of 28%. Which means that you only get to keep 100%-28% = 72% of your gains. So 0.72 * 8.1 = 5.832 which means your effective earning percentage is only 5.832% which is less than the 6.1% rate you get for the tax-exempt investment. Another consideration that wasn't taken into account for the question is the earnings on the taxable investment may push you up into a higher tax bracket. Which in turn increases the tax burden on your other investments. So the better choice here is the 6.1% tax-exempt investment even though that first glance the 8.1% investment looks higher.</span>
The right answer for the question that is being asked and shown above is that: "Activity." The type of control focuses on measuring a company’s products territories, customer groups, segments, trade channels, and order sizes to help expand or eliminate any products or marketing activities is called the <span>Activity </span>
