The constitutional principle that worked during the estimation of the 2010 Census is referred to as reapportionment.
<h3>Which constitutional principle worked in the 2010 Census?</h3>
- In 2010, there was a census held in the United States that was widely participated in.
- The result of the census was determined through reapportionment.
- In conducting the decennial census, the seats of the U.S. House of Representatives were reapportioned.
- The seats of the legislative body are distributed among administrative units and subdivisions.
- This had a direct impact on the elections conducted in 2012.
- Therefore, reapportionment was a constitutional principle operative in the 2010 decennial census.
- Article two of the US Constitution explains the nature, scope, and features of reapportionment.
Therefore, the constitutional principle that worked during the estimation of the 2010 Census is referred to as reapportionment.
Learn more about the 2010 United States Census here: brainly.com/question/3217491
#SPJ2
Answer: it is thought that thousands of Europeans lived in Imperial China during the period of Mongol rule. These were people from countries traditionally belonging to the lands of Christendom during the High to Late Middle Ages who visited, traded, performed Christian missionary work, or lived in China. This occurred primarily during the second half of the 13th century and the first half of the 14th century, coinciding with the rule of the Mongol Empire, which ruled over a large part of Eurasia and connected Europe with their Chinese dominion of the Yuan dynasty Whereas the Byzantine Empire centered in Greece and Anatolia maintained rare incidences of correspondence with the Tang, Song and Ming dynasties of China, the Roman papacy sent several missionaries and embassies to the early Mongol Empire as well as to Khanbaliq (modern Beijing), the capital of the Mongol-led Yuan Dynasty. These contacts with the West were only preceded by rare interactions between the Han-period Chinese and Hellenistic Greeks and Romans.
Explanation:
It debated how a person was saved, through faith or a mixture of faith and custom/works, especially circumcision
All but the first one as Germany took all the blame through the war guilt clause (article 231)
