Answer:
The correct approach is Option B (Peer Review).
Explanation:
- Rather made reference to someone as a scientific peer-review, it encourages the specialist who has not been essential to the study team to analyze the study objectively and pointed out everyone's mistakes. It serves as major self-regulation for scholars and aims to make the publishing process somewhat credible. Hence, the solution to this issue is Peer Examination.
- Funding organizations rarely have the capabilities to recognize out mistakes, whereas definitive analysis is a method of study that helps to make a definitive statement. The gathering of data is simply a process of scientific study.
Other approaches do not apply to the example mentioned. Although the one mentioned is right.
First we need to find the limiting reactant. This is the reactant that is theoretically consumed completely first. Theoretical yield is how much product is produced given the limiting reactant is consumed and the percent yield is the fraction of the actual products produced and the theoretical products produced.
The limiting reactant is <span>Pb(<span>C2</span><span>H3</span><span>O2</span><span>)2.
The theoretical yield is </span></span>1.2373008g and you should get the Percent yield which is Actual yield/theoretical yield. <span />
1.6 mol x 42.39g/1 mol = 67.82g of LiCl.
Answer:
The amount present is 36g
Explanation:
Here, we are interested in calculating the amount of zinc in the bronze alloy since it is 18% of the total mass
What we do here is to calculate 18% of the total 200g
Mathematically, that would be 18/100 * 200 = 18 * 2 = 36g
Because the mirror is a reflection no matter what is in front of the mirror we can see it because if the reflection it gives off at any certain time