The demographic representation in the judge should be similar to their representation in the population. The term used to describe this is descriptive representation. This means that the lowest level of representation as a judge in the federal courts has the smallest demographic group in the population.
<span>The most recent study was done on June 1, 2017, and all information is from that date. There are 673 US District court judgeships and four territorial ones. At the time of this study, there were 160 active circuit court judges and 19 vacant positions, while there were 570 district court judges and a whopping 103 vacant positions.
There are 59 female circuit court judges, 37%. Men, therefore, are in 63% of positions. Intesretingly, this number has actually improved, with only one woman serving in 1977.
Disregarding race, 75% of circuit court judges are white, 13% African American, 9% Hispanic, and only 3% Asian American. 12 courts have African American judges, nine have Hispanic, and five have Asian American. Overall, all three percentages have risen since 1977 (with some variability), but interestingly, Asian Americans have only recently begun to rise in presence., starting in about 2010.
Combining gender and race, white men make up 45.6% of all circuit court judges, while Asian American women only make up 0.6%. In all races, men overpower women in numbers by a large amount.
Looking at age, the average is 64.7 years old, with over 50% over 65 and only 2% under 45. The vast majority were appointed between 45 and 54, though many came slightly before or after.
It is worth noting that the first openly gay circuit court judge was Todd M. Hughes, appointed by Obama in 2013.
If we are considering race, Asian Americans are the lowest represented. If we are considering gender, women are less represented. Overall in race and gender, Asian American women are least represented. Looking at age, people under 40 are underrepresented. Overall, though, the least common demographic would be open members of the LGBT+ community.
As you can see, this is not a straightforward question! It is a hugely interesting topic and one I plan to explore further.</span>
The answer for this question is: Convergence Convergence is a form of action that will transform a certain difference between two parties into one uniformity. This step is really important so the accountant that operates all around the world will have the same standard to conduct in handling their financial operations.
Answer: The correct answer is "c. normally sets the financial objectives first and then sets the objectives in the other perspectives to accomplish the financial objectives.".
Explanation: The balanced scorecard approach normally sets the financial objectives first and then sets the objectives in the other perspectives to accomplish the financial objectives.
The balanced scorecard states that we must focus on the organization from four perspectives and that goals, measures, rules or objectives be developed for these perspectives.
The 4 perspectives are:
- Financial: which is the most important one whose objectives are established first and the objectives of the other perspectives will be established in order to meet the objective of the financial perspective.
The $77,600 made to purchase equipment would be reported as a cash outflow in the investing activities section. This is because asset purchased such as equipment is an investment while the cash used to purchase the asset is regarded as cash outflow.
Dividends are recorded in the financing section, while cash paid for interest and paid to suppliers would be recorded in the operating activities.
