1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
telo118 [61]
3 years ago
15

Evaluate the expression and enter your answer in the box below |0|

Mathematics
1 answer:
Scorpion4ik [409]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

0

Step-by-step explanation:

When put in between these lines || a negative number becomes positive and a positive number stays the same.

You might be interested in
A rectangular prism has a length of 3 inches, a width of 5 inches, and a height of 7 inches.
Leni [432]

Answer:

105³

Step-by-step explanation:

3x5=15

15x7=105

105 is your answer.

3 0
2 years ago
Quick I need help plz
Olenka [21]

Answer:

It's answer is 1/3 .

Hope it helps have a great time :)

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
On Wednesday, James slept for <img src="https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=%5Cfrac%7B3%7D%7B8%7D" id="TexFormula1" title="\frac{3}{8}" alt=
Hatshy [7]

Answer:

I believe he slept for 9 hours of the day

Step-by-step explanation:

⅜ of 24

24 ÷ 8 = 3

3 × 3 = 9

8 0
3 years ago
Consider the following proposed proof by contradiction that for all positive integers n, 3n &gt; 2.
laila [671]

Answer:

The proof contains a simple direct proof, wrapped inside the unnecessary logical packaging of a proof by contradiction framework.

Step-by-step explanation:

The proof is rigourous and well written, so we discard the second answer.

This is not a fake proof by contradiction: it does not have any logical fallacies (circular arguments) or additional assumptions, like, for example, the "proof" of "All the horses are the same color". It is factually correct, but it can be rewritten as a direct proof.

A meaningful proof by contradiction depends strongly on the assumption that the statement to prove is false. In this argument, we only this assumption once, thus it is innecessary. Other proofs by contradiction, like the proof of "The square root of 2 is irrational" or Euclid's proof of the infinitude of primes, develop a longer argument based on the new assumption, but this proof doesn't.

To rewrite this without the superfluous framework, erase the parts "Suppose that the statement is false" and "The fact that the statement is true contradicts the assumption that the statement is false. Thus, the assumption that the statement was false must have been false. Thus, the statement is true."

7 0
3 years ago
-5 can be thought of as "the opposite of 5". TRUE or FALSE
kap26 [50]

Answer:

True

Step-by-step explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Help me plz??? For all of it it's do today in a few
    15·1 answer
  • Factoring Gcf -2x^2-2x+84
    10·1 answer
  • 3m + 7m - 0.8 &lt; 9.2 someone answer this quick plz
    9·2 answers
  • Name at least one alternate option to establishing credit if you are unable to get a credit card yet.
    8·1 answer
  • I only need the answer
    10·1 answer
  • HEY GUYS I HOPE I WAS ABLE TO HELP uuuuuuu today have a great night!!!!!!!!/dayyyy!!!!!!!!!!!!
    12·2 answers
  • PLS HELP I WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!
    7·2 answers
  • An object is moving at a speed of 850 miles per hour. Express this speed in meters per minute.
    13·2 answers
  • 14.
    10·1 answer
  • Dmitri buys 23 pound of mixed nuts, 12 pound of chocolate
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!