<u>Answer:
</u>
Yes, the court should grant the motion to suppress as the police had searched for and taken into custody the marijuana bricks without having a search warrant.
<u>Explanation:
</u>
- For the action carried out by the police to be deemed as lawful, the police should have a warrant issued by the magistrate.
- An operation carried out by the police in private property without a warrant is considered as a breach of rights of the individual and can be used against the police.
- Any property taken into custody by the police without a search warrant can be asked to be suppressed by the defendant.
Answer:
before a warrant can be issued
Explanation:
The Fourth Amendment is where a police officer or anybody else can't search your personal property without a warrant. Even if they have reasonable suspicion, they must get the judge to sign the warrant. If the police have a search warrant, they are required by law to search your property for any evidence.
He used the profit he made as an investment, and in this way his fortune grew ever bigger and bigger. If ever there was a profit, he would not spend it, but use to expand the current business, or if this way not optimal, to buy new businesses and assets.
<span />
Answer:
The correct answer is: A heretical point of view.
Explanation:
The heretical point of view can be clearly explain from a religious point, as heresy could be explain as something against the church beliefs. In the case of John, he thinks it would be an evasion not to accomplish with the purposes of the enterprise in the market. That is to say, he is talking about the opposite of what he believes it should happen for the benefit of the company.
