Answer: All competitive advantages do not accrue to large-sized firms. A major advantage of smaller firms are that they "(B) can launch competitive actions more quickly."
Explanation: Smaller companies can launch competitive actions faster because being smaller, communication is much faster, and decision-making involves fewer interested people who may differ in opinions to direct competitive strategies.
Answer: 1. real GDP declined.
Explanation:
If labor productivity fell yet the workforce did not increase, that means that for Years 1 and 2, workers were producing less than they were producing before because the same number of people were producing.
This means that the amount of goods produced in the country would reduce and therefore GDP would reduce as well as GDP is the amount of goods and services produced in a country. If labor productivity had fallen yet the work-hours had increased, the increase in worker hours would have made up for the loss of labor productivity.
Answer:
Contracting Officer Representative
Explanation:
- An agent of a contracting officer is a person appointed in compliance with the subdivision of DFARS .and approved by the contracting agency in law to automate repetitive technological or essential functions.
- A security officer is a man who shares information to interact and coordinate their events between two organizations.
by these process COR work.
Answer:
c. liable on the ground that Mesa is an intended third-party beneficiary
Explanation:
In a contract, the third-party beneficiary is a business or a person that benefits from the agreement and the terms of the contract that is made between the two other parties. According to law, third-party beneficiary have certain rights which they can enforced if the contract is not fulfilled.
In the context, Mesa is a third party beneficiary. The Mesa County enters into a contract with New Construct Inc. to construct a court house. Now New Construct Inc. again hires the firm Odell to excavate the land site.
While excavating Odell damages few nearby properties, so Mesa County files a law suit against Odell. But Odell argues that Odell is not in agreement with Mesa County or have not entered into with any contract with the County, so Mesa cannot sue the excavator.
But the court hold that as Mesa County is the third party beneficiary of the contract and have certain rights, Odell is held liable for the loss and should compensate for the loss to the County.
