Answer:
6 miles
Step-by-step explanation:
60 miles : 5 inches
12 miles : 1 inch
6 miles : 1/2 inch
whatever you do to one side of the ratio you have to do to the other.
to get from 1 to a 1/2 you divide by 2, so you do 12 divided by 2 which is 6.
Answer: A
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
132.7495 cm^2
Step-by-step explanation:
area of circle=πr^2
radius=6.5
6.5^2
42.25
42.25*3.142
132.7495
13.80 x 2= 27.60
1 pizza equals 13.80 so two pizzas will be twice that money amount. Both pizzas will cost $27.60.
I hope this helped
9514 1404 393
Answer:
4a. ∠V≅∠Y
4b. TU ≅ WX
5. No; no applicable postulate
6. see below
Step-by-step explanation:
<h3>4.</h3>
a. When you use the ASA postulate, you are claiming you have shown two angles and the side between them to be congruent. Here, you're given side TV and angle T are congruent to their counterparts, sides WY and angle W. The angle at the other end of segment TV is angle V. Its counterpart is the other end of segment WY from angle W. In order to use ASA, we must show ...
∠V≅∠Y
__
b. When you use the SAS postulate, you are claiming you have shown two sides and the angle between them are congruent. The angle T is between sides TV and TU. The angle congruent to that, ∠W, is between sides WY and WX. Then the missing congruence that must be shown is ...
TU ≅ WX
__
<h3>5.</h3>
The marked congruences are for two sides and a non-included angle. There is no SSA postulate for proving congruence. (In fact, there are two different possible triangles that have the given dimensions. This can be seen in the fact that the given angle is opposite the shortest of the given sides.)
"No, we cannot prove they are congruent because none of the five postulates or theorems can be used."
__
<h3>6.</h3>
The first statement/reason is always the list of "given" statements.
1. ∠A≅∠D, AC≅DC . . . . given
2. . . . . vertical angles are congruent
3. . . . . ASA postulate
4. . . . . CPCTC
