Gallivant, because you’re “roaming with pleasure” not “roaming with purpose”
Answer:
It would include more details about Oliver's feelings.
Explanation:
The narrator is third person omniscient, and assumes the points of view of various characters in turn. The narrator’s tone is not objective; it is sympathetic to the protagonists and far less so to the novel’s other characters. When dealing with hypocritical or morally objectionable characters, the narrative voice is often ironic or sarcastic.
Answer: B. hope
Explanation:
Ronald Reagan in this speech expressed his dreams on what the United States could be like if he was elected president. The views he had were positive and said in such a way that he was optimistic about the future of the country.
When a person expresses optimism about the future, they do so with hope because hope is the feeling we get when we want something optimistic to happen in future.
Answer:
Topic: The decision to censor particular books is often tied to current political or social debates.
1. People are social media addicts. The internet is usually either plainly seen as republican or democratic views and they are expressed to you in a manner that you could actually believe what they are writing about. They attempt to reach into your own morals and values and convince you that you need to read a certain book - or that a book has things in it that would not be appropriate for you and your beliefs.
Hopefully, the students have a teacher, as myself, that will encourage them to read all the banned books that they can get their hands on. Even though most of all literature is somewhere on the web, I encourage you to purchase the banned books. Politically motivated censorship is usually someone trying to please the people. Give them what they want; in reality we do not want books to be banned. It is simple really, if you do not want to read it, then do not read it. Whatever is going on in the news, is usually somewhere in history and written about already. History repeats itself and it is evident that there are people that want to control what you think and what you say. They want to control people. There is no government for the people by the people any longer, if they continue to ban books. If we allow them to continue to ban books, this will trickle slowly into other areas of our lives. They start slow, and then they get into the media to try to sway people to believe a certain way.
Explanation:
Books - the ones you still can hold in your hand and read - will continue to disappear. People will try to control what you think, eat, believe and attempt to change your value system and your morals.
Fake news? possibly, but in reality, no on should ban books.
If you have not READ (not watched) Fahrenheit 451, I encourage you to do so. Read the book. If you choose to watch the movie, wait until you have read the book.
