Ask question

Ask question

All categories

4 years ago

6

The firm initially produced 500 pants and 700 shirts. If the firm decides to increase the number of shirts by 100 units, the opp

ortunity cost will be pants. If the firm is at point E and decides to increase the production of shirts by 500 units, the opportunity cost will be pants.

2 answers:

Volgvan4 years ago

6 0

200 for the first one and 400 for the second one

Scrat [10]4 years ago

4 0

<span>If the firm decides to increase the number of shirts by 100 units, the opportunity cost will be 200 pants. If the firm is at point E and decides to increase the production of shirts by 500 units, the opportunity cost will be 400 pants.</span>

You might be interested in

Instructions: Please make sure that you show all your work when solving the problems. Feel free to make any assumptions whenever

My name is Ann [436]

Answer:

Explanation:

From the given information:

The current price = $\dfrac{Dividend(D_o) \times (1+ Growth \ rate) }{\text{Cost of capital -Growth rate}}$

$15 = \dfrac{0.50 \times (1+ Growth rate)}{8\%-Growth rate}$

$15 \times (8 -Growth \ rate) = 0.50 +(0.50 \times growth \ rate)$

$1.20 - (15 \times Growth \ rate) = 0.50 + (0.50 \times growth \ rate)$

$0.70 = (15 \times growth \ rate) \\ \\ Growth \ rate = \dfrac{0.70}{15.50} \\ \\ Growth \ rate = 0.04516 \\ \\ Growth \ rate \simeq 4.52\% \\ \\$

2. The value of the stock

Calculate the earnings at the end of 5 years:

$Earnings (E_o) \times Dividend \ payout \ ratio = Dividend (D_o) \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) \times 35\% = \$0.50 \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) =\dfrac{\$0.50}{35\%} \\ \\ = \$1.42857$

$Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = Earnings (E_o) \times (1 + Growth \ rate)^{no \ of \ years} \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$1.42857 \times (1 + 12\%)^5 \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$2.51763$

Terminal value year 5 = $\dfrac{Earnings (E_5) \times (1+ Growth \ rate)}{Interest \ rate - Growth \ rate}$

$=\dfrac{\$2.51763\times (1+0.04516)}{8\%-0.04516}$

=$75.526

Discount all potential future cash flows as follows to determine the stock's value:

$\text{Value of stock today} =\bigg( \sum \limits ^{\text{no of years}}_{year =1} \dfrac{Dividend (D_o) \times 1 +Growth rate ) ^{\text{no of years}}}{(1+ interest rate )^{no\ of\ years} }$

$+ \dfrac{Terminal\ Value }{(1+interest \ rate )^{no \ of \ years}} \Bigg)$

$\implies \bigg(\dfrac{\$0.50\times (1 + 12\%)^1) }{(1+ 8\%)^{1} }+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^2 }{(1+8\% )^{2}}+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^3 }{(1+8\% )^{3}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^4 }{(1+8\% )^{4}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^5 }{(1+8\% )^{5}} + \dfrac{\$75.526}{(1+8\% )^{5}} \bigg )$

$\implies \bigg(\dfrac{\$0.5600}{1.0800}+\dfrac{\$0.62720}{1.16640}+\dfrac{\$0.70246}{1.2597}+\dfrac{\$0.78676}{1.3605}+\dfrac{\$0.88117}{1.4693}+ \dfrac{\$75.526}{1.4693} \bigg)$

=$ 54.1945

As a result, the analysts value the stock at $54.20, which is below their own estimates.

3. The value of the stock

Calculate the earnings at the end of 5 years:

$Earnings (E_o) \times Dividend payout ratio = Dividend (D_o) \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) \times 35\% = \$0.50 \\ \\ Earnings (E_o) =\dfrac{\$0.50}{35\%}\\ \\ = \$1.42857$

$Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = Earnings (E_o) \times (1 + Growth \ rate)^{no \ of \ years} \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$1.42857 \times (1 + 12\%)^5 \\ \\ Earnings (E_5) year \ 5 = \$2.51763 \\ \\$

Terminal value year 5 = $\dfrac{Earnings (E_5) \times (1+ Growth \ rate)\times dividend \ payout \ ratio}{Interest \ rate - Growth \ rate}$

$=\dfrac{\$2.51763\times (1+ 7 \%) \times 20\%}{8\%-7\%}$

=$53.8773

Discount all potential cash flows as follows to determine the stock's value:

$\text{Value of stock today} =\bigg( \sum \limits ^{\text{no of years}}_{year =1} \dfrac{Dividend (D_o) \times 1 + Growth rate ) ^{\text{no of years}}}{(1+ interest rate )^{no \ of\ years} }+ \dfrac{Terminal \ Value }{(1+interest \ rate )^{no \ of \ years }} \bigg)$

$\implies \bigg( \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1 + 12\%)^1) }{(1+ 8\%)^{1} }+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^2 }{(1+8\% )^{2}}+ \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^3 }{(1+8\% )^{3}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^4 }{(1+8\% )^{4}} + \dfrac{\$0.50\times (1+12\%)^5 }{(1+8\% )^{5}} + \dfrac{\$53.8773}{(1+8\% )^{5}} \bigg)$

$\implies \bigg (\dfrac{\$0.5600}{1.0800}+\dfrac{\$0.62720}{1.16640}+\dfrac{\$0.70246}{1.2597}+\dfrac{\$0.78676}{1.3605}+\dfrac{\$0.88117}{1.4693}+ \dfrac{\$53.8773}{1.4693} \bigg)$

=$39.460

As a result, the price is $39.460, and the other strategy would raise the value of the shareholders. Not this one, since paying a 100% dividend would result in a price of $54.20, which is higher than the current price.

Notice that the third question depicts the situation after 5 years, but the final decision will be the same since we are discounting in current terms. If compounding is used, the future value over 5 years is just the same as the first choice, which is the better option.

The presumption in the second portion is that after 5 years, the steady growth rate would be the same as measured in the first part (1).

8 0

3 years ago

Since the beginning of the twentieth century, the United States has experienced _________ recessions. Of those, ______ have occu

faltersainse [42]

Answer: 22; 7

Explanation;

A Recession refers to the economy of a country contracting for at least 2 quarters.

Since the the beginning of the twentieth century, the United States has experienced<u> 22 recessions </u>with the worst being the Great Depression of 1929 and the Great Recession of 2008.

Of those,<u> 7 have occurred since 1970</u> with the 7th ongoing as a result of the Corona virus pandemic.

5 0

3 years ago

Despite the danger to his career what did edward r. murrow, fred friendly and the staff at cbs accomplish with their truthful re

Liula [17]

Murrow had become a big superstar from his WWII reporting, so he was a big ratings asset for CBS. In reserve to See it Now, he also did a celebrity interview show called Person to Person. Both performances got high ratings by today's criteria, but Person to Someone was more popular.

<h3>How did Edward R Murrow end his broadcast?</h3>

The blitz gave Murrow the signature phrases that he used to open and close his broadcasts. He started by saying “This is London.” He completed his reports with “Goodnight and good luck.” That was a phrase Londoners used to end their discussions when they were not sure they'd be able to see each other the next day.

<h3>Who was Edward R. Murrow ?</h3>

Edward Roscoe Murrow was an American broadcast correspondent and war correspondent. He first attained prominence during World War II with a series of live radio broadcasts from Europe for the news section of CBS.

To learn more about Edward Roscoe, refer

brainly.com/question/14433468

#SPJ4

7 0

2 years ago

Seng is a single mother struggling to raise her family with a low income. In 2006, the Pension Protection Act was passed. This a

elena55 [62]

Answer:

d. doesn’t have an employer-sponsored pension or retirement plan.

Explanation:

The Pension Protection Act provides for the benefit of employees, which is through their own and employer contributions.

This is a policy to provide benefit at times when the person turns old or is not physically fit to perform any job and this, provides pension in terms of money.

Here, if Seng being a single mother is not eligible for this, means that she did not had any employer who could sponsor her for such plan.

As this pension plan had to be sponsored by the employer Seng might did not had any employer.

4 0

3 years ago

Why do countries trade?

Helen [10]

Answer:

Most of the time it's simply for goods another country has that they don't.

Explanation:

Back around 1500 china traded with places like Europe, Africa and other parts of Asia simply for different spices and resources.

8 0

3 years ago