Answer:
True
Explanation:
The foundation and rise of the Ottoman Empire is a period of history that started with the emergence of the Ottoman principality in c. 1299, and ended circa 1453. This period witnessed the foundation of a political entity ruled by the Ottoman Dynasty in the northwestern Anatolian region of Bithynia, and its transformation from a small principality on the Byzantine frontier into an empire spanning the Balkans, Anatolia and North Africa. For this reason, this period in the empire's history has been described as the "Proto-Imperial Era".[1] Throughout most of this period, the Ottomans were merely one of many competing states in the region, and relied upon the support of local warlords and vassals to maintain control over their realm. By the middle of the fifteenth century the Ottoman sultans were able to accumulate enough personal power and authority to establish a centralized imperial state, a process which was brought to fruition by Sultan Mehmed II (r. 1451-1481).[2] The conquest of Constantinople in 1453 is seen as the symbolic moment when the emerging Ottoman state shifted from a mere principality into an empire therefore marking a major turning point in its history.
<em>B</em><em>t</em><em>w</em><em> </em><em>c</em><em>o</em><em>r</em><em>r</em><em>e</em><em>c</em><em>t</em><em> </em><em>m</em><em>e</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em>f</em><em> </em><em>i</em><em> </em><em>a</em><em>m</em><em> </em><em>w</em><em>r</em><em>o</em><em>n</em><em>g</em>
It started in the year of 1840.
Rome. St. Ignatius of Antioch, who was martyred around 110AD because of his Christian faith, described Rome as having the "presidency of love." The church at Rome was also said to be founded by St. Peter and St. Paul, and both reportedly died there.
This is true. Jim Crow laws were made by people who still opposed slavery being abolished, these laws kept African Americans from exercising the rights that they were promised after they were freed.
Answer: According to utilitarianism, a moral theory (philosophy, belief) suggests that an action is right if it is to the benefit or happiness of the majority or a group. In this case, this father should consider others instead act, only, in behalf of on his own son.