Ask question

Ask question

All categories

tekilochka [14]

2 years ago

10

Liam is making barbecue ribs over a fire. The internal temperature of the ribs when he starts cooking is 40°F. During each hour

of cooking, the internal temperature will increase by 25%. The ribs are safe to eat when they reach 165°F.
Use the drop-down menus to complete an inequality that can be solved to find how much time, t, it will take for the internal temperature to reach at least 165°F.

1 answer:

Soloha48 [4]2 years ago

4 0

Answer: You need to wait at least 6.4 hours to eat the ribs.

t ≥ 6.4 hours.

Step-by-step explanation:

The initial temperature is 40°F, and it increases by 25% each hour.

This means that during hour 0 the temperature is 40° F

after the first hour, at h = 1h we have an increase of 25%, this means that the new temperature is:

T = 40° F + 0.25*40° F = 1.25*40° F

after another hour we have another increase of 25%, the temperature now is:

T = (1.25*40° F) + 0.25*(1.25*40° F) = (40° F)*(1.25)^2

Now, we can model the temperature at the hour h as:

T(h) = (40°f)*1.25^h

now we want to find the number of hours needed to get the temperature equal to 165°F. which is the minimum temperature that the ribs need to reach in order to be safe to eaten.

So we have:

(40°f)*1.25^h = 165° F

1.25^h = 165/40 = 4.125

h = ln(4.125)/ln(1.25) = 6.4 hours.

then the inequality is:

t ≥ 6.4 hours.

You might be interested in

Type the correct answer in each box. Use numerals instead of words. For this question, any answer that is not a whole number sho

egoroff_w [7]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Since we are not given the value of P, |Q|, R and S, we can as well assume values for them for the sake of this question.

Let P = 5, |Q| = 6, R =7 |S| = 2

Note that since Q and S are in modulus sign, they can return both positive and negative values.

P+Q = 5 + 6 (note that the positive value of Q is used since we need the greatest value of P+Q)

P+Q = 11

Hence the greatest value of P+Q is 11

For the least value of P+Q, we will use the negative value of Q as shown

P+Q = 5+(-6)

P+Q = 5-6

P+Q = -1

Hence the least value of P+Q is -1

Similarly:

R+S = 7 + 2 (note that the positive value of S is used since we need the greatest value of R+S)

R+S = 9

Hence the greatest value of R+S is 9

For the least value of R+S, we will use the negative value of S as shown

R+S = 5+(-2)

R+S = 5-3

R+S = 2

Hence the least value of P+Q is 2

NOTE THAT THIS ARE ASSUMED VALUES. ALL YOU NEED IS TO PLUG IN THE VALUES OF P, Q and R THAT YOU HAVE IN CASE THE VALUES DIFFERS.

5 0

3 years ago

Fill in the other coordinate for the line 7x - 5y = 21: (4, )

garri49 [273]

7x - 5y = 21....(4,?)...so sub in 4 for x and solve for y
7(4) - 5y = 21
28 - 5y = 21
-5y = 21 - 28
-5y = - 7
y = 7/5

check..
7(4) - 5(7/5) = 21
28 - 35/5 = 21
28 - 7 = 21
21 = 21 (correct)

the other coordinate is 7/5......(4,7/5)

8 0

2 years ago

A furniture company manufactures desks and chairs. Each desk uses four units of wood, and each chair uses three units of wood. A

Troyanec [42]

Step-by-step explanation:

Although I cannot find any model or solver, we can proceed to model the optimization problem from the information given.

the problem is to maximize profit.

let desk be x

and chairs be y

400x+250y=P (maximize)

4x+3y<2000 (constraints)

according to restrictions y=2x

let us substitute y=2x in the constraints we have

4x+3(2x)<2000

4x+6x<2000

10x<2000

x<200

so with restriction, if the desk is 200 then chairs should be at least 2 times the desk

y=2x

y=200*2

y=400

we now have to substitute x=200 and y=400 in the expression for profit maximization we have

400x+250y=P (maximize)

80000+100000=P

180000=P

P=$180,000

the profit is $180,000

5 0

3 years ago

Use Lagrange multipliers to find the maximum and minimum values of (i) f(x,y)-81x^2+y^2 subject to the constraint 4x^2+y^2=9. (i

sp2606 [1]

i. The Lagrangian is

$L(x,y,\lambda)=81x^2+y^2+\lambda(4x^2+y^2-9)$

with critical points whenever

$L_x=162x+8\lambda x=0\implies2x(81+4\lambda)=0\implies x=0\text{ or }\lambda=-\dfrac{81}4$

$L_y=2y+2\lambda y=0\implies2y(1+\lambda)=0\implies y=0\text{ or }\lambda=-1$

$L_\lambda=4x^2+y^2-9=0$

If $x=0$ , then $L_\lambda=0\implies y=\pm3$ .
If $y=0$ , then $L_\lambda=0\implies x=\pm\dfrac32$ .
Either value of $\lambda$ found above requires that either $x=0$ or $y=0$ , so we get the same critical points as in the previous two cases.

We have $f(0,-3)=9$ , $f(0,3)=9$ , $f\left(-\dfrac32,0\right)=\dfrac{729}4=182.25$ , and $f\left(\dfrac32,0\right)=\dfrac{729}4$ , so $f$ has a minimum value of 9 and a maximum value of 182.25.

ii. The Lagrangian is

$L(x,y,z,\lambda)=y^2-10z+\lambda(x^2+y^2+z^2-36)$

with critical points whenever

$L_x=2\lambda x=0\implies x=0$ (because we assume $\lambda\neq0$ )

$L_y=2y+2\lambda y=0\implies 2y(1+\lambda)=0\implies y=0\text{ or }\lambda=-1$

$L_z=-10+2\lambda z=0\implies z=\dfrac5\lambda$

$L_\lambda=x^2+y^2+z^2-36=0$

If $x=y=0$ , then $L_\lambda=0\implies z=\pm6$ .
If $\lambda=-1$ , then $z=-5$ , and with $x=0$ we have $L_\lambda=0\implies y=\pm\sqrt{11}$ .

We have $f(0,0,-6)=60$ , $f(0,0,6)=-60$ , $f(0,-\sqrt{11},-5)=61$ , and $f(0,\sqrt{11},-5)=61$ . So $f$ has a maximum value of 61 and a minimum value of -60.

5 0

3 years ago

Rewrite the expression as a product using the GCF and distributive property. 27 + 45

vovangra [49]

Step-by-step explanation:

GCF of 27 and 45 is 9

3 0

2 years ago

Read 2 more answers