First of all scientific evidence is anything that is gathered using the scientific method that supports a hypothesis can be considered. According to me, a good place to start evaluating is to look at whether the evidence was collected using good scientific principles.
Good luck :)
Answer:
The pair will be:
- NH3/NH4⁺
- ClO⁻/HClO
Explanation:
A conjugate acid is formed after a base has reacted/accepted a proton.
Since H2O is amphiprotic, we can use it as the acid.
NH3 + H2O ⇄ NH4⁺ + OH⁻
ClO⁻ + H2O ⇄ HClO + OH⁻
after reacting, the base form conjugate acid.
Answer: wait im gonna search some info.
Explanation:I come back with an asnwer for you
Answer:
neither accurate nor precise
Explanation:
Accuracy is the ability to give the same result on different measurements made under the same conditions or to give the desired result accurately, therefore, as observed in the image, the results are not accurate, since they are all different.
They are not precise either, since the precision is the degree of agreement between the independent results of a measurement, obtained under stipulated conditions, be it repeatability, reproducibility or intermediate.
La primera instrucción es verdadera, la segunda es falsa porque dos elementos no pueden tener el mismo número de masa (excepto azufre y argón) Estrictamente hablando, No. Puede tener 2 (o más) elementos con el mismo 'número de masa atómica', lo que significa que el número total de nucleones (neutrones de protones) es el mismo. En el ejemplo dado en una respuesta anterior, el azufre tiene un isótopo con el número de masa atómica 36 (16p 20n) y Argón también tiene un 36 (18p 18n). La tercera declaración es verdadera, si tiene un número diferente de neutrones, entonces es un isótopo. La cuarta declaración es falso. Espero que esto te ayude.
