If a person doesn't trust you then they will tell other people and the other people won't trust you
Answer:
Part 1: The correct option is False.
Part 2: The correct option is False.
Explanation:
<em>For the first Question</em>
The correct answer is False as GDP has increased due to women participation in workforce.
<em>For the second Question</em>
The correct answer is False as the change in measure of well being is less than the change in GDP.
Answer: SEE EXPLANATION
Explanation:
Given the following ;
Values depending on Success
$150M, $135M, $95M, $80M
Risk free rate = 5% = 0.05
Pervebtage to be lost in case of bankruptcy = 25% = 0.25
A.) 0.25 × [( 150 + 135 + 95 + 80) ÷ 1.05] = $109.52 million
Assume a zero-coupon debt with a $100million face value
B.) 0.25 × [( 100 + 100 + (95×0.75) + (80×0.75)) ÷ 1.05] = $78.87 million
C.) Yield to maturity (YTM)
(100M÷78.87M) - 1
1.2679 - 1 = 0.2679 = 26.79%
Expected return = 5%
D.) Equity value
0.25 × [( 150 + 135 + (95×0.75) + (80×0.75)) ÷ 1.05] = $99.11 million
E.) share if no debt is issued
109.52 ÷ 10 = 10.95 per share
F.) Share price if debt of $100M is issued
99.11 ÷ 10 = 9.91 per share
The price differs because bankruptcy cost will Lower the share price.
Yes, stores should be forced to obey minimum prices for a good or a company that is selling a service should as well. They should have to obey by this so that price competition isn't ongoing in the market. Larger producers can often charge a smaller amount for a product because they are producing them in high qualities. By charging less it gives them a competitive advantage over their competition in means of price. Unless the item is on clearance because a company is discontinuing stock of that item, they should have a set minimum as they do a set maximum they are allowed to charge for that item.
