Because ionic compounds' strong bonds form network structures, which have a stronger attraction than the covalent compounds which are molecules.
Answer:
Samira's model correctly demonstrates how the properties changed with the rearrangement of the atoms. However not all atoms are accounted for. There is a missing reactant.
Explanation:
Samira's model correctly demonstrated how the atoms in two compounds reacted to form two new products. However, the elements present in the reactants side should be the elements that make up the new products in the product side. But as the diagram shows, Sameera has mistakenly added a new element to one of her products which will be wrong.
Send the link code I’ll join
Answer:
you work out the moles by finding the grand formula mass them you divide the actual mass by the grand formula mass: 25/160 (my grand formula mass is probably slightly different from yours) which I got 0.15625 then I times it by 32(O2) and I got 5. but my periodic table is different. it's whole numbers. ;-)
Explanation:
4.44